Smolin-TWOP on string theory does not reproduce time dependant phenomenon

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
While I cannot now offer a page #, Smolin in TWOP offers his assessment of string theory as a theory of QG by pointing out that while GR does offer quantitative predictions of time dilation effects, string theory does not (if I understood Smolin correctly).

Any comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Get your page reference and exact quote, we can't have a discussion based on vague hearsay, with no assurance that you got the correct impression from what you read.

Maybe someone else can get a page reference and quote for this. I don't remember seeing what you say you saw in the book, but someone else may.

ensabah6 said:
...Smolin in [The Trouble with Physics] ... pointing out that while GR does offer quantitative predictions of time dilation effects, string theory does not...
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
Get your page reference and exact quote, we can't have a discussion based on vague hearsay, with no assurance that you got the correct impression from what you read.

Maybe someone else can get a page reference and quote for this. I don't remember seeing what you say you saw in the book, but someone else may.

Smolin was alluding to this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

"Yet another central problem of string theory is that the best understood backgrounds of string theory preserve much of the supersymmetry of the underlying theory, which results in time-invariant space-times: currently string theory cannot deal well with time-dependent, cosmological backgrounds."

Smolin argues that the above failure is why string theory is NOT a theory of QG.


Personally there is no guarantee that the 11D of strings will hide away 4 large smooth dimensions. The so-called semiclassical limit of string QG is as far away as in LQG.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top