Smolin-TWOP on string theory does not reproduce time dependant phenomenon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Lee Smolin, in "The Trouble with Physics," critiques string theory's inability to predict time-dependent phenomena, contrasting it with General Relativity's (GR) quantitative predictions of time dilation effects. He asserts that string theory's reliance on time-invariant space-times undermines its status as a viable theory of quantum gravity (QG). The discussion emphasizes the need for specific page references and quotes to substantiate claims regarding Smolin's arguments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) and its predictions
  • Familiarity with string theory fundamentals
  • Knowledge of quantum gravity (QG) concepts
  • Ability to interpret academic texts and references
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time-invariant space-times in string theory
  • Explore the differences between string theory and loop quantum gravity (LQG)
  • Study the quantitative predictions of General Relativity regarding time dilation
  • Examine critiques of string theory in contemporary physics literature
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum gravity and the limitations of string theory.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
While I cannot now offer a page #, Smolin in TWOP offers his assessment of string theory as a theory of QG by pointing out that while GR does offer quantitative predictions of time dilation effects, string theory does not (if I understood Smolin correctly).

Any comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Get your page reference and exact quote, we can't have a discussion based on vague hearsay, with no assurance that you got the correct impression from what you read.

Maybe someone else can get a page reference and quote for this. I don't remember seeing what you say you saw in the book, but someone else may.

ensabah6 said:
...Smolin in [The Trouble with Physics] ... pointing out that while GR does offer quantitative predictions of time dilation effects, string theory does not...
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
Get your page reference and exact quote, we can't have a discussion based on vague hearsay, with no assurance that you got the correct impression from what you read.

Maybe someone else can get a page reference and quote for this. I don't remember seeing what you say you saw in the book, but someone else may.

Smolin was alluding to this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

"Yet another central problem of string theory is that the best understood backgrounds of string theory preserve much of the supersymmetry of the underlying theory, which results in time-invariant space-times: currently string theory cannot deal well with time-dependent, cosmological backgrounds."

Smolin argues that the above failure is why string theory is NOT a theory of QG.


Personally there is no guarantee that the 11D of strings will hide away 4 large smooth dimensions. The so-called semiclassical limit of string QG is as far away as in LQG.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K