So I was thinking about Light, right ?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RagingPineapple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Thinking
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the properties of light, specifically its speed of 670,616,629 mph and the energy carried by photons. Participants clarify that the energy of a photon is determined by the equation E = hν, where h is Planck's constant and ν is the frequency, rather than its speed. The conversation emphasizes that photons are massless particles, and thus traditional kinetic energy concepts do not apply. The analogy of photons as bullets is deemed misleading, as photons operate under quantum mechanics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Planck's constant (h)
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Basic grasp of photon energy equations (E = hν)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck's constant in quantum physics
  • Explore the relationship between photon frequency and energy
  • Learn about electromagnetic wave propagation and its characteristics
  • Investigate advanced concepts in quantum mechanics, such as wave-particle duality
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of light and energy transfer.

RagingPineapple
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
...and I was wondering,

Light travels at 670,616,629mph, which is rather fast.

For light to travel that fast, it must carry a huge amount of energy, surely? So, if that's the case, why do we get so comparatively little from current solar energy mediums?

Are there any ideas or theories that might help get more out of it?
 
Science news on Phys.org
RagingPineapple said:
...and I was wondering,

Light travels at 670,616,629mph, which is rather fast.

For light to travel that fast, it must carry a huge amount of energy, surely? So, if that's the case, why do we get so comparatively little from current solar energy mediums?

Are there any ideas or theories that might help get more out of it?

Light travels the same velocity whether it is dim (single photon) or intense. Don't confuse the speed of light with the energy carried by that light. The energy carried ratios with the number of photons and the inverse of their wavelength, and has nothing to do with the speed of the photons.
 
How does that work? I suppose I'm thinking of it in terms of a bullet, an object going that fast would be pretty hazardous. And I suppose a bigger bullet at the same speed would obviously carry more energy.

So is it the case that photons are just stupidly small, and the more you have the bigger the bullet? Or am I thinking of this wrong?
 
Photons are massless. I think you're thinking in terms of, something massive that was going that fast would have a great deal of inertia. (Though something that's massive cannot reach the speed of light.)
 
RagingPineapple said:
How does that work? I suppose I'm thinking of it in terms of a bullet, an object going that fast would be pretty hazardous. And I suppose a bigger bullet at the same speed would obviously carry more energy.

So is it the case that photons are just stupidly small, and the more you have the bigger the bullet? Or am I thinking of this wrong?

For photons, each individual photon carries an energy of E = h \nu where h is Planc's constant, and \nu is the frequency of the photon in Hz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

The total energy in an electromagnetic wave is the sum of the energy in the individual photons making up that wave (or composite waves).
 
But, given the speed they're going, wouldn't there be a lot of kinetic energy?
 
Deathwing said:
But, given the speed they're going, wouldn't there be a lot of kinetic energy?
As berkeman stated, the energy of a photon is E = hf. Speed is not a factor.
 
Deathwing said:
But, given the speed they're going, wouldn't there be a lot of kinetic energy?

Since they have no mass, the kinetic energy equation is irrelevant.
 
RagingPineapple said:
I suppose I'm thinking of it in terms of a bullet,

Don't think of photons as like bullets. They're quintessentially quantum objects, and you quickly run into trouble when you try to visualize them in classical terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K