So the question is: What does it really mean to give 100%?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "giving 100%" and what it means in various contexts, particularly in relation to effort, achievement, and the use of percentages in describing performance. It includes mathematical interpretations, cultural references, and personal anecdotes, exploring both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a mathematical approach to defining 100% through letter values, suggesting that attitude is key to achieving it, while other factors like hard work and knowledge fall short.
  • Another participant challenges the mathematical definition, arguing that letters were assigned integer values rather than percentages.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the validity of the original mathematical claims, with one insisting on the need for sources to support such theories.
  • There are inquiries about the applicability of the concept in different languages, particularly Mandarin and Japanese, with mixed responses regarding its feasibility.
  • Some participants reference cultural perceptions of effort, with one noting that phrases like "giving 110%" may imply that individuals are not reaching their full potential.
  • A humorous remark is made about the idea of Mike Tyson being the only one to give more than 100% in a sports context.
  • One participant suggests that the interpretation of 100% can vary significantly between individuals, indicating that the concept is subjective and context-dependent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the mathematical interpretation or the cultural implications of "giving 100%." Disagreements arise regarding the validity of the original claims and the applicability of the concept across different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion lacks clear definitions and that the mathematical steps presented may not be universally accepted or applicable. The subjective nature of effort and achievement is highlighted, suggesting that personal interpretations play a significant role in understanding the concept of 100%.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
This is a strictly a mathematical viewpoint...it goes like this:

What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100%? Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%. How about achieving 103%? What makes up 100% in life?

Here's a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:

If:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.

Then:

H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%


and


K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%

But,

A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%

And,

B-U-L-L-S-*-*-T
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%

AND, look how far a** kissing will take you.

A-*-*-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%

So, one can conclude with
mathematical certainty, that While Hard work and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there, it's the Bullsh*t and A** Kissing that will put you over the top. Kiss
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Uhm... But you defined the letters as integers, not as percentages.
 
I'm sorry, but we don't allow fringe theories. Please cite your sources or I'll have to "citizen's moderate" you and delete the thread.
 
Would this work in Mandarin?
 
I'm surprised my uncle in Ohio hasn't emailed this to me yet.
 
waht said:
Would this work in Mandarin?

Not very well, no. It'd be like applying numbers to words. I suppose it'd be okay in either of the Japanese kana systems, though.
 
Tobias Funke said:
I'm sorry, but we don't allow fringe theories. Please cite your sources or I'll have to "citizen's moderate" you and delete the thread.

I believe this is one of Einstein's postulates for his Grand Unified Theory of Life. Hardly "fringe" research.
 
"People that give 110% are slackers. 130% is the new 110%."
-DaveC426913 - a long time ago
 
I'm with the op 103%.
 
  • #10
Pengwuino said:
I believe this is one of Einstein's postulates for his Grand Unified Theory of Life. Hardly "fringe" research.

I don't know. It seems to go against all the sports guys who combine effort, hustle, team play and taking it one game at a time to give their 110% every night. And most of them are college grads, so they're pretty up there on the IQ scale.
 
  • #11
what said:
Would this work in Mandarin?

Maybe pin yin.
 
  • #12
Tobias Funke said:
I don't know. It seems to go against all the sports guys who combine effort, hustle, team play and taking it one game at a time to give their 110% every night. And most of them are college grads, so they're pretty up there on the IQ scale.

The college grads are the ones that didn't work hard enough to get drafted early.
 
  • #13
Chi Meson said:
I'm surprised my uncle in Ohio hasn't emailed this to me yet.

Oh so that's who that guy in Ohio was who e-mailed that to me.
 
  • #14
Look, 100% of one person versus 100% of another can be quite different with regard to outcome. That, in itself, should give you a clue as to what 100% means in this scenario.
That said, 110%(or such) is an inference to those not reaching their full potential of 100%

In other words, "give it 110%" usually infers that you have only applied 90% effort.
 
  • #15
In the world of sports, only Mike Tyson holds the honor of having had more than 100% to give, before spitting it out.
 
  • #16
pallidin said:
Look, 100% of one person versus 100% of another can be quite different with regard to outcome. That, in itself, should give you a clue as to what 100% means in this scenario.
That said, 110%(or such) is an inference to those not reaching their full potential of 100%

In other words, "give it 110%" usually infers that you have only applied 90% effort.

No, in that case, giving a relative effort of 110% would be equal to giving 99%, not 100%.
 

Similar threads

High School Natural Numbers contain all the Primes
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
MHB Adding in Base 20: 1HE1C +JDF0 = 2H7GC
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Difficult to understand the solution provided in the video (travelling salesman problem)
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad Can New Theorems Predict Incomplete 5x5 Magic Square Solutions?
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
Undergrad I need to write a function for DPI screen scaling with parameters
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
MCNP6 Fatal Error : Models required
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad Help with a cartesian problem to find a geocache.
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
High School Possible factor(s) of 2^(12n+9)+1
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
High School What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100%?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
High School What is the sum of the decoded numbers 58, 121, and 79?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K