Solid Propellant Burn Rate Sensitivity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of elevation changes on the burn rate of solid propellant rocket engines. Participants concluded that while atmospheric pressure decreases with altitude, it has a negligible effect on chamber pressure, which primarily governs burn rate and thrust. The consensus is that solid rocket motors perform better at higher altitudes due to reduced drag and improved combustion efficiency. Additionally, the ideal thrust equation was referenced to illustrate the relationship between chamber pressure and ambient pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid rocket propulsion principles
  • Familiarity with atmospheric pressure effects on rocket performance
  • Knowledge of thrust equations and parameters (e.g., chamber pressure, specific heat ratio)
  • Experience with model rocketry and engine specifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ideal thrust equation and its variables in detail
  • Study the effects of atmospheric pressure on rocket performance at various altitudes
  • Examine the combustion process in solid propellant rockets
  • Explore the relationship between drag and altitude in rocketry
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, model rocketry enthusiasts, and anyone interested in optimizing solid rocket motor performance will benefit from this discussion.

good_ken
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have been flying some model rockets powered by commercially available solid propellant engines. I have been flying at an elevation of 2550 above sea level. I am headed to a competition next week and will be flying near sea level.

The air density will change approximately 5% due to the elevation change. Will this air density change affect the burn rate of the propellant the same way it would an air breathing engine (ie more thrust at sea level)?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does your intuition tell you?
 
My instinct tells me that the difference in atmospheric pressure won't be significant compared to the chamber pressure, which is what burn rate (thrust) depends on.
 
good_ken said:
My instinct tells me that the difference in atmospheric pressure won't be significant compared to the chamber pressure, which is what burn rate (thrust) depends on.
Well the chamber pressure depends on the burn rate. One is correct that atmospheric pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure.

In solid rockets the fuel and oxidizer are mixed, so oxygen in air has no effect on the combustion process. Once the chemical reaction initiates - it goes.

Rocket performance improves as atmospheric pressure decreases, which is why one will see performance numbers for sea level and low pressure or vacuum of space. Rocket motors perform better in space.

Also, drag increases as atmospheric density increases. At higher altitudes, the same rocket can fly higher (with respect to its starting point) than it would taking off at sea level.

So, at higher altitudes with lower air density, rockets have better motor performance and less drag.
 
Astronuc said:
Well the chamber pressure depends on the burn rate. One is correct that atmospheric pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure.

In solid rockets the fuel and oxidizer are mixed, so oxygen in air has no effect on the combustion process. Once the chemical reaction initiates - it goes.

Rocket performance improves as atmospheric pressure decreases, which is why one will see performance numbers for sea level and low pressure or vacuum of space. Rocket motors perform better in space.

Also, drag increases as atmospheric density increases. At higher altitudes, the same rocket can fly higher (with respect to its starting point) than it would taking off at sea level.

So, at higher altitudes with lower air density, rockets have better motor performance and less drag.

That makes sense. We have calculated a 5% increase in drag by going to sea level, so that is accounted for. It was engine that we didn't have a feel for.
 
Do you know what the chamber pressure is for the solid rocket motor? Anyway, the differential pressure should be insignificant between 2550 ft and sea level, so drag is the biggest factor.
 
Astronuc said:
Rocket performance improves as atmospheric pressure decreases, which is why one will see performance numbers for sea level and low pressure or vacuum of space. Rocket motors perform better in space.
[..]
Also, drag [..]

Really? You mean, even regardless of drag due to increased air density (say, consider some bench-mounted thrust test) higher atmospheric pressure will slightly decrease performance? (If anything, I would have thought chamber pressure and reaction rate would go up..)
 
cesiumfrog said:
Really? You mean, even regardless of drag due to increased air density (say, consider some bench-mounted thrust test) higher atmospheric pressure will slightly decrease performance? (If anything, I would have thought chamber pressure and reaction rate would go up..)
If you look at the thrust for most applications, it is degraded at lower altitudes. Mostly because at lower altitudes the backpressure on the nozzle is greater. The ideal thrust equation is

F = A_t P_1 \sqrt{\frac{2 \gamma^2}{\gamma-1}\left (\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)^{\frac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}}\left[1-\left(\frac{P_2}{P_1}\right)\right]^{(\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma})} }+(P_2-P_3)A_2

Where
F = Thrust
P_1 = Chamber Pressure
\gamma = Specific Heat Ratio
A_t = Throat Area
P_2 = Pressure at the exit plane of the nozzle
P_3 = Ambient Pressure
A_2 = Exit Area
 
Last edited:
In addition to what FredGarvin wrote, think about -

What causes 'chamber pressure' and what controls the reaction rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
21K