What is the derivation of the rocket equation?

In summary, a conversation between two individuals discusses the process of deriving the rocket equation. The equation involves calculating the change in velocity based on the time of engine cutoff and the velocity at that point. The conversation also touches on the issue of mass being time-dependent and the use of conservation of momentum in the equation. The force on the rocket is dependent on the rate of ejection of gases and ejection speed. The conversation ends with a suggestion to start from the beginning with conservation of momentum.
  • #1
MattRob
211
29
Hello,
A little something I've been working on for fun today was trying to derive the rocket equation:
[itex]Δv=V_{e}ln(R)[/itex]

So first I start with
[itex]F=ma[/itex]

[itex]=m\frac{dv}{dt}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{F}{m}dt = dv[/itex]

[itex]∫_{0}^{Tco} \frac{F}{m}dt = ∫_{0}^{v} dv[/itex]

Where Tco is the time of engine cutoff, and v is the velocity at that point in time. ie; what will the velocity be at the end of this thrusting period?
Now, since mass is time-dependent, we write mass as a function of time:

[itex]m(t) = m_{i} - αt[/itex]

Where α is the burn rate of the propellant in kg/s.

[itex]∫_{0}^{Tco} \frac{F}{m_{i} - αt}dt = ∫_{0}^{v} dv[/itex]

Now here's the part where I think something is going wrong:

[itex]∫_{0}^{Tco} \frac{F}{m_{i} - αt}dt = ∫_{0}^{v} dv[/itex]

[itex]F∫_{0}^{Tco} \frac{1}{m_{i} - αt}dt = v = F(ln(m_{i}-αTco) - ln(m_{i}))[/itex]

Now with [itex]m_{i} - αTco = m_{f}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{m_{f}}{m_{i}} = R[/itex] ,

[itex]v = F ln(\frac{m_{i} - αTco}{m_{i}}) = F ln(R)[/itex]


It all works excellently for the natural logarithm term, but not for the [itex]V_{e}[/itex] term. I was thinking I could write
[itex]F = m\frac{dv}{dt}[/itex] and integrate [itex]∫_{0}^{Tco} \frac{m\frac{dv}{dt}}{m_{i} - αt}dt[/itex],
but then when it comes time to integrate I can't get rid of the mass term. Same problem whether or not I cancel the dt's before integrating (honestly, I don't really understand much on how to handle the dx differentials - I'm only up to linear algebra and integral calculus, no multivariable or diff Eq. yet).

It seems like I should be able to leave the F term alone, though, since, as with α, it's constant over the duration of the engine burn. But I guess not?

So what's going on?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The force on the rocket depends on the rate of ejection of gases. And the ejection speed as well.
You did not seem to use this.
 
  • #3
MattRob said:
So first I start with
[itex]F=ma[/itex]

That works for systems with constant mass only. As the mass of the rocket and of the ejected reaction mass changes, you need to use F=dp/dt or conservation of momentum instead.
 
  • #4
I would start from the beginning with conservation of momentum. Consider the instant before the exhaust products are ejected, and, a small increment of time dt later, an instant after the exhaust products are ejected. After you get an equation for that, consider the velocities of the rocket relative an inertial reference frame, the exhaust products relative to the frame, and the rocket relative to the exhaust products. You can then make some substitutions. Then, with a little trickery, you should be able to relate the rate of fuel consumption and the velocity of the rocket relative to the products to the mass and acceleration of the rocket.
 
  • #5
I think responders are on the right track - especially DrStupid.

Force is equal to (exhaust velocity/g)*(Fuel rate * g) and it is based on conservation of momentum. You throw a certain amount of stuff out the back at a certain velocity, it has a certain momentum. The rocket has a change in momentum equal in magnitude, but in the opposite direction of the stuff you threw out the back. Obviously, force is slightly misleading since, in space, there will be no equal and opposite force - there's just conservation of momentum. The units work out to be Newtons or pounds, though.

* The g's in the equation are acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the Earth and are there because this is an old equation created using pounds force and pounds mass (slugs weren't invented until sometime around 1910). They're a byproduct of unit conversion; not there for some physical reason. They can be extremely misleading, especially when using this equation (or variations of this equation) on the Moon or other planets. People think that they have to calculate acceleration due to gravity for the celestial object they're sitting on instead of using g (the constant) no matter where they are.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the rocket equation?

The rocket equation is a mathematical formula that explains the relationship between the mass of a rocket, its velocity, and the amount of fuel needed to propel it into space.

2. Who developed the rocket equation?

The rocket equation was first derived by Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky in the late 19th century. It was later refined by German scientist Hermann Oberth and American physicist Robert Goddard in the early 20th century.

3. Why is the rocket equation important?

The rocket equation is important because it helps scientists and engineers calculate the amount of fuel needed for a rocket to reach a specific destination. It also helps in designing efficient rocket engines and determining the maximum payload a rocket can carry.

4. What are the variables in the rocket equation?

The variables in the rocket equation include the mass of the rocket (m), the mass of the propellant (mp), the velocity of the rocket (v), the velocity of the exhaust gases (ve), and the gravitational constant (g).

5. How is the rocket equation derived?

The rocket equation is derived using Newton's laws of motion and the principles of conservation of momentum and energy. By considering the forces acting on a rocket and its propellant, the equation can be derived and used to calculate the rocket's performance.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
238
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
594
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
580
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top