Solid state technology/electronics textbook?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting appropriate textbooks for a directed study in solid state technology and a condensed matter physics course. Participants explore various textbook options and their relevance to the courses being taken, as well as the potential overlap between the subjects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is considering using "Solid State Electronics" by Ben Streetman but is open to suggestions for better alternatives that are rigorous yet reader-friendly.
  • Another participant notes that Streetman's book is a standard text for engineers in solid state theory and suggests supplemental readings from S. M. Sze, Kittel, or Ashcroft & Mermin.
  • A participant mentions taking a condensed matter physics course using "The Physics of Solids" by Richard Turton and questions its suitability for the course and its relationship to the solid state technology course.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential overlap between the condensed matter physics course and the solid state technology course, with one participant suggesting that if the focus is not on solid state devices or materials, the two may be too similar.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to specialize in solid state technology and seeks clarification on whether Turton's book will adequately cover condensed matter physics topics, including superconductivity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the suitability of textbooks and the overlap between the courses. There is no consensus on which book is definitively better or whether taking both courses is advisable.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a conclusion regarding the best textbook for solid state technology or the appropriateness of the condensed matter physics course in relation to their studies. There are also unresolved questions about the specific content covered in Turton's book and its alignment with the goals of the courses.

leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
I am doing a directed study in solid state technology next semester and I need to find a book I would like to use. The professor mentioned this textbook by ben streetman. I have been reading through it myself and while it is a decent book, I figure there might be something better out there for this subject. The link to the streetman book is below.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0131587676/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The professor asked me if I had a preference for a book. I would be fine with streetman (the prof already has a copy too), but if there's something better then I'd like to use it.

This is a field that I would like to get into and study in further depth, so I want to use the best book possible. Something rigorous, yet reader friendly.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Streetman's book is the standard text used by engineers for solid state theory. For supplemental reading, look into S. M. Sze (for solid state devices) and Kittel or Ashcroft & Mermin (for solid state physics).
 
I am also taking a condesned matter physics course that uses 'the physics of solids', by richard turton.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0198503520/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Is this a good book for a consensed matter course? Will this course supplement the solid state technology course? Are the two courses too similar? One of an engineering class and the other is a physics class.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
leright said:
I am also taking a condesned matter physics course that uses 'the physics of solids', by richard turton.
This is quite unusual. Is this course being offered by the physics dept or by some engineering dept? Turton's book (which I've never read, myself) is also typically used by engineers, to the best of my knowledge.

If you intend to specialize in anything but solid state devices or a materials related field, the two courses would be too similar to each other to be a good use of time and money. If, however, you do plan to specialize in solid state technology, then this combination could be useful.
 
Gokul43201 said:
This is quite unusual. Is this course being offered by the physics dept or by some engineering dept? Turton's book (which I've never read, myself) is also typically used by engineers, to the best of my knowledge.

If you intend to specialize in anything but solid state devices or a materials related field, the two courses would be too similar to each other to be a good use of time and money. If, however, you do plan to specialize in solid state technology, then this combination could be useful.

I plan to specialize in solid state tech and the condensed matter course is offered by the physics department. So, I guess having these two courses will help me master the subject, but if they overlap a great deal then maybe I should reconsider taking both of these...I will talk to the professors teaching the course...

I guess my question is, is the turton book going to give me a proper education in condensed matter physics, from a physicist's perspective, including subjects like superconductivity?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K