Soln of Leplace in Cartesian Coord

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Laplace equation in Cartesian coordinates, specifically addressing the confusion around the general solution and the application of boundary conditions. The equations presented include the separation of variables into three ordinary differential equations: \(\frac{X''(x)}{X(x)}=-k_x^2\), \(\frac{Y''(y)}{Y(y)}=-k_y^2\), and \(\frac{Z''(z)}{Z(z)}=k_z^2\). The general solution is expressed as \(\Phi(\vec{x})=X(x)Y(y)Z(z)\) with specific forms for \(X(x)\), \(Y(y)\), and \(Z(z)\). The coefficients \(A_{1,2}\), \(B_{1,2}\), and \(C_{1,2}\) are determined by boundary conditions, which are crucial for simplifying the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and its significance in potential theory.
  • Familiarity with ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and their solutions.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions and their role in solving differential equations.
  • Basic concepts of electric potential and fields in electrostatics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in solving partial differential equations.
  • Learn about boundary value problems and how to apply boundary conditions effectively.
  • Explore Fourier series and their application in determining coefficients in solutions.
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in the presence of dielectric materials.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focused on electrostatics, potential theory, and mathematical methods for solving differential equations.

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm getting confused solving the Laplace eqn in Cartesian coordinates.

The equation can be solved by solving each of
[itex] \frac{X''(x)}{X(x)}=-k_x^2, \qquad\qquad<br /> \frac{Y''(y)}{Y(y)}=-k_y^2, \qquad\qquad<br /> \frac{Z''(z)}{Z(z)}=k_z^2[/itex]

and then substituting into the equation
[itex] \Phi(\vec{x})=X(x)Y(y)Z(z)[/itex]

The solution to the (general) ODE's is
[itex] X(x)=A_1e^{ik_xx}+A_2e^{-ik_xx}, \qquad\qquad<br /> Y(y)=B_1e^{ik_yy}+B_2e^{-ik_yy}, \qquad\qquad<br /> Z(z)=C_1e^{k_zz}+C_2e^{k_zz}[/itex]

But the solution when solving for the electric potential is given by
[itex] \Phi_{k_x,k_y,\pm}(\vec{x})=exp\left(ik_xx+ik_yy \pm\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2}\right)[/itex]

Where am I going wrong?
Why have they let the coefficients [itex]A_{1,2}, B_{1,2}, C_{1,2}=1[/itex]?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The values for the coefficients in the general solution can be found by applying the boundary conditions of the problem. Nobody can answer your question without more information about what the boundary conditions were. (You need to give us the whole problem.) Depending on the geometry of the problem, certain conditions will force certain coefficients to have particular values, which will usually simplify your solution to something with a manageable form. You will normally end up doing something like Fourier's trick to determine the value of the coefficient determined by the last boundary condition, and you will end up with an expression for the potential. Sometimes, things will simplify really nicely.
 
Last edited:
So then is the general solution always

[itex] \Phi(\vec{x})=\left[A_1e^{ik_xx}+A_2e^{ik_xx}\right]\cdot\left[B_1e^{ik_yy}+B_2e^{ik_yy}\right]\cdot\left[C_1e^{k_zz}+C_2e^{-k_zz}\right][/itex]

and depending on the boundary condition we solve for the [itex]A_{1,2}, B_{1,2}, C_{1,2}, k_1 \quad\mbox{and}\quad k_2[/itex]?

The problem I have is solving the electric potential of a uniform field, when a dielectric cube is placed within it. I can assume that the field lines are parallel to two of the cube's sides.

If you know how I can approach this problem, I would be grateful if you could guide me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K