Solubility of a Substance in solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter xykiist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The solubility of Mg(OH)2 in a 0.55 mol/L KOH solution is influenced by the significantly higher concentration of OH- from KOH. The Ksp of Mg(OH)2 is 9.0x10-12, leading to the equation Ksp = [Mg2+][OH-]^2. Given the high concentration of OH-, the solubility expression can be simplified, approximating the hydroxide term as (0.55)^2. This indicates that the concentration of Mg2+ is minimal compared to the OH- concentration. The approach to solving the cubic equation can be streamlined by recognizing this dominance of OH-.
xykiist
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What is the solubility of Mg(OH)2 in a 0.55mol/L solution of KOH if the Ksp of Mg(OH)2 is 9.0x10-12?

I figured out that the initial concentration of OH- in the solution is 0.55mol/L. I did an ICE table for Mg(OH)2 and (assume x represents an unknown concentration) found that the concentration of Mg2+ is x, and OH- is 0.55mol/L+2x.
So if I continue with it, I get to this point:

Ksp=[Mg2+][OH-]^2
9.0x10-12=x(2x+0.55)^2
When i expand it and move everything to the right, i get a cubic equation that takes a lot of time to solve and so I get the feeling I'm not approaching this correctly. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the Ksp of MgOH2 is only 9X10-12, you see that the concentration of OH- is ABSOLUTELY DOMINATED by the concentration of OH- due to KOH, which is completely soluble at that concentration. Thus, the hydroxide term for your solubility expression is quite accurately approximated as (0.55)2.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top