Solubility Product Constant Question

AI Thread Summary
The solubility-product constant for K2PdCl6 is 6.0 x 10^-6, and the discussion revolves around calculating the K+ concentration after mixing 50.0 mL of 0.200 M KCl with 50.0 mL of 0.100 M PdCl6(2-). Participants suggest determining the initial concentrations of KCl and PdCl6(2-) and identifying which is in excess to find the concentration of K+. The calculations show that the new concentrations are 0.2 M for KCl and 0.06 M for PdCl6(2-). The approach involves using the solubility product equation to deduce the equilibrium concentrations after accounting for any precipitate formed. Ultimately, the correct concentration of K+ is derived from the equilibrium conditions established by the solubility product constant.
startle101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The solubility-product constant for K2PdCl6 is 6.0 x 10^ -6 (K2PdCl6 ---> 2K+ + PdCl6 2-). What is the K+ concentration of a solution prepared by mixing 50.0 mL of 0.200 M KCl with 50.0 mL of 0.100M PdCl6(2-)?

My Approach (thus far):

1) get mmol of KCl and PdCl6(2-) and get difference of them for excess mmol (of what though?).

2) I'm not really sure what to do from there without knowing which would be in excess...My hunch is to solve whatever is in excess to similar terms to get concentration of K+.

Anyways, this questions has had me scratching my head for a few days. Thanks for all the help I get!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
startle101 said:
The solubility-product constant for K2PdCl6 is 6.0 x 10^ -6 (K2PdCl6 ---> 2K+ + PdCl6 2-). What is the K+ concentration of a solution prepared by mixing 50.0 mL of 0.200 M KCl with 50.0 mL of 0.100M PdCl6(2-)?

My Approach (thus far):

1) get mmol of KCl and PdCl6(2-) and get difference of them for excess mmol (of what though?).

2) I'm not really sure what to do from there without knowing which would be in excess...My hunch is to solve whatever is in excess to similar terms to get concentration of K+.

Anyways, this questions has had me scratching my head for a few days. Thanks for all the help I get!

- Find the new concentrations.

- If the solubility product is saturated by incorporating the two concentrations into the solubility product equation then use the equation to find the amount of precipitate formed.

-From this deduce the actual saturation concentrations of the K + cations.
 
GCT said:
- Find the new concentrations.

- If the solubility product is saturated by incorporating the two concentrations into the solubility product equation then use the equation to find the amount of precipitate formed.

-From this deduce the actual saturation concentrations of the K + cations.

You see, that's my ultimate confusion - the first step.

I will show you how I'm doing everything mathematically below

0.200 M KCl x .05 L = .01 mol KCl

0.100 M PdCl6(2-) x .05 L = .006 mol PdCl6(2-)

Now I divide each by total volume ( 50 mL + 50 mL = 100 mL)

.01 mol KCl/.100 L = 0.1 M KCl x 2 = 0.2 M KCl (because of stoichiometric factor from equation above)

.006 mol PdCl6(2-)/.100 L = 0.06 M PdCl6(2-)

So, I have the new concentrations...My goal is to get [K+] though; however, unfortunately, this is where I'm stuck...

I could substitute [PdCl6(2-)] = 2 [K+]

which would then end up as...

2 [K+][K+]^2 = 6.0 x 10^-6

where [K+] = 0.0144 M

Is that the correct approach? How would you correct it?
 
startle101 said:
0.100 M PdCl6(2-) x .05 L = .006 mol PdCl6(2-)[/quot]e

? Why 6?

[K+] = 0.1
[PdCl62-] = 0.05

0.1[sup2[/sup]*0.05 > Kso, so obviously there was a precipitate.

Now, you know that some of the K+ was removed from the solution in the form of precipitate. Assume it was x moles. That means that equilibrium concentration of K+ is

\frac {0.05L*0.2M-2x} {0.1L}

do the same thing to find concentration of PdCl62-. Write formula for Kso, solve for x.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top