Solution for higher order wave ODE

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around solving a fourth-order wave equation represented as an integral involving the displacement function u(x). Participants explore the formulation of the differential equation and potential methods for finding solutions, including analytical and numerical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a fourth-order wave equation and seeks assistance in solving it, assuming constants are zero.
  • Another participant clarifies the differential equation's form, suggesting it can be expressed as a second-order equation.
  • A different participant critiques the initial integral formulation as potentially meaningless, emphasizing the need for clarity in the problem statement.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of reducing the order of the equation and mention methods such as reduction of order and separation of variables.
  • One participant asserts that the non-linear ODE is analytically solvable, leading to an elliptic integral, but notes that finding the inverse function may be impractical.
  • Another participant highlights the relationship between the constants in the equation and the speed of the wave, suggesting that the original fourth-order equation can be reduced to a second-order form.
  • One participant expresses a preference for explicit relations or approximations over numerical solutions, mentioning methods involving Jacobi elliptic functions or generalized Riccati equations.
  • Another participant suggests that an approximate method may depend on the expected values of the constants, indicating that some terms might dominate in certain scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the formulation and solvability of the equation, with some agreeing on the need to clarify the differential equation's structure while others propose various methods for approaching the problem. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original equation is derived from Hamilton's principle and involves non-linearities that complicate the solution process. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the constants and their effects on the wave behavior.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying non-linear differential equations, wave mechanics, or seeking methods for solving complex mathematical problems in physics and engineering.

Romik
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Here is an equation that I have tried for few days to solve and still haven't succeeded, I'm interested to solve this 4th order wave equation to find u(x).

∫∫(A u(x) + B u(x)2 + C u(x)3 +D u''(x)) dx dx=0

the 4th term is second derivative of displacement u(x). I assume constants are zero.

I would appreciate any hint or comment.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the DE?
Do I take it that you mean to solve:
A u(x) + B u(x)2 + C u(x)3 +D u''(x) = 0

i.e. $$u^{\prime\prime} = au^3+bu^2+cu$$
 
What you have written, \int\int ... dx dx, is meaningless. Simon Bridge is assuming that you mean that the integral over an arbitrary region in the plane is 0. In that case the integrand must be 0. If you intend an integral over a specific region, that is not true.
 
Yes, obviously the DE is that expression.
Thanks for comment

Simon Bridge said:
What is the DE?
Do I take it that you mean to solve:
A u(x) + B u(x)2 + C u(x)3 +D u''(x) = 0

i.e. $$u^{\prime\prime} = au^3+bu^2+cu$$
 
You are right,

Thanks.

HallsofIvy said:
What you have written, \int\int ... dx dx, is meaningless. Simon Bridge is assuming that you mean that the integral over an arbitrary region in the plane is 0. In that case the integrand must be 0. If you intend an integral over a specific region, that is not true.
 
OK - so if I'm reading this correctly,

Problem Statement:
Given $$Au^3(x)+Bu^2(x)+Cu(x)+D\frac{d^2u}{dx^2}=0$$... find the general solution for u(x).

Attempt at a solution:
You tried to integrate the entire thing twice wrt x, ...

Would that be correct?
Sorry - I find it far from clear what you are trying to say and I think it is important for me to understand the problem when I am trying to help you.

If this is so then the DE is second order (not fourth) and of form:
$$\frac{d^2u}{dx^2}=f(u)$$ Have you tried: reduction of order and/or separation of variables?

Aside: You have indicated that this is associated with the wave equation. Which seems to suggest that $$-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{d^2u}{dt^2}=Au^3(x)+Bu^2(x)+Cu(x)$$ ... is that correct?
 
Hi !

This non-linear ODE is analytically solvable, leading to the inverse function of u(x).
The result on the form of x as a function of u is an elliptic integral (attachment).
Solving this elliptic integral involves the roots of a polynomial equation of the 4th degree. As a consequence, the formal result involving an elliptic function is a very complicated formula :
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+du/sqrt(g-a*u^2-b*u^3-c*u^4)&x=0&y=0
The function obtained x(u) is so big that computing the inverse function u(x) in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions is probably not realisic, nor usefull in practice. Numerical methods for solving the ODE are more convenient.
 

Attachments

  • Elliptic.JPG
    Elliptic.JPG
    34 KB · Views: 558
Simon Bridge

Thanks again for the comment,

These types of equations are called "Autonomous" and they are very common in classical mechanics (Hamiltonian systems)
in this case $$\frac{d^2u}{dx^2}=f(u)$$ is second order special case! (it is independent of first order derivative). terms in $$f(u)$$ come from some nonlinearities in the system. the original equation derived from Hamilton principle is order 4th, we can reduce the order to second by integration, after that we should solve the ODE with some uncommon functions and approximations like Jacobi elliptic cosine function! it is not as easy as separation of variables! A, B, C, and D are constants and they are related somehow with speed of wave.
 
JJacquelin

Thank you so much for your time and help.

Unfortunately I need a relation (even approximation) explicitly and I can't go with numerical solution,
I tried Mathematica before, I know, it doesn't help.
I'm thinking about Jacobi elliptic function, or generalized Riccati equation method.

Once again, thanks.
 
  • #10
An approximate method would depend on what sort of values you expect for the constants: perhaps some of the terms dominate?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K