Solution for x^3-x=y needed, is solution an approximation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elginz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation y = x^3 - x, with a proposed solution for x involving complex expressions. The user questions whether their solution is an approximation, highlighting the complexity of the formula due to the lack of parentheses. Other participants suggest using clearer formatting, such as the tex editor, to make the equation more understandable. They also mention the existence of imaginary roots alongside the real root in the context of cubic equations. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in mathematical expressions to facilitate accurate analysis.
elginz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a formula to be solved for x that is y=x^3-x

I have a solution given x=((27y^2-4)^.5/23^2/3+y/2)^1/3 + 1/3((27y^2-4)^.5/23^2/3+y/2)^1/3 which seems to work

Is this solution an approxiamation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
elginz said:
I have a formula to be solved for x that is y=x^3-x

I have a solution given x=((27y^2-4)^.5/23^2/3+y/2)^1/3 + 1/3((27y^2-4)^.5/23^2/3+y/2)^1/3 which seems to work

Is this solution an approxiamation?

I would guess it probably is an approximation. But with your expressions full of "/" division signs and no parentheses, it is impossible to figure out what the formula actually is.

Either put in needed parentheses or, better, post it using the tex editor by using the \sum button.
 
It's one of these 3 equations. Basically a variant of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_number" .

Note that x_{i1} is one imaginary root, x_{i2} is another, and lastly x_{r} is the real root.

x_{i1}=\left( -\frac{\sqrt{3}\,i}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\right) \,{\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}+\frac{\frac{\sqrt{3}\,i}{2}-\frac{1}{2}}{3\,{\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}}
x_{i2}=\left( \frac{\sqrt{3}\,i}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\right) \,{\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}+\frac{-\frac{\sqrt{3}\,i}{2}-\frac{1}{2}}{3\,{\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}}
x_{r}={\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}+\frac{1}{3\,{\left( \frac{\sqrt{27\,{y}^{2}-4}}{2\times{3}^{\frac{3}{2}}}-\frac{y}{2}\right) }^{\frac{1}{3}}}


Corrected it a bit... looked like 233/2 instead of 2*33/2. Thus the 2x3...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top