Solution of Parametric Bessel's equation.

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the parametric Bessel's equation represented by the differential equation x²y'' + xy' + (λ²x² - 1/4) = 0, with boundary conditions y(0) = finite and y(π) = 0. The transformation t = λx leads to the general solution expressed as y = C₁J₁/₂[√(2/πλx)sin(λx)] + C₂J₋₁/₂[√(2/πλx)sin(λx)]. However, the book suggests using the second independent solution Y₋₁/₂ instead of J₋₁/₂, which raises questions about the necessity of using Bessel functions of the second kind when p is not an integer. The discussion concludes that Y functions are essential for certain boundary conditions, despite the initial confusion regarding their application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bessel functions, specifically J and Y functions.
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems in differential equations.
  • Knowledge of parametric transformations in differential equations.
  • Basic concepts of linear independence in solutions of differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel functions of the first kind (J) and second kind (Y).
  • Explore boundary value problems and their solutions in the context of differential equations.
  • Learn about the implications of linear independence in the context of differential equations.
  • Investigate the role of parametric transformations in simplifying complex differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those focused on boundary value problems and Bessel functions in their work.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Problem to solve: [tex]x^{2}y''+xy'+(\lambda^{2}x^{2}-\frac{1}{4})=0[/tex] subject to [tex]y(0)=finite,y(\pi)=0[/tex]
Let [tex]t=\lambda x[/tex] which give [tex]t^{2}\frac{d^{2}y}{dt^{2}}+t\frac{dy}{dt}+(t^{2}-\frac{1}{2})y=0[/tex]

With that first linear independent solution is [tex]J_{\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)][/tex] and second independent solution is [tex]J_{-\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)][/tex]

Since these two are linear independent solution, I should be able to write the general solution of y:

[tex]y=C_{1}J_{\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)] + C_{2}J_{-\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)][/tex]

But the book claimed the solution of y:[tex]y=C_{1}J_{\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)] + C_{2}Y_{-\frac{1}{2}}[\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi\lambda x}}sin(\lambda x)][/tex]

Question is why do I have to use Y in the second solution instead of both J to solve the boundary value problem? I always learn that if you get the two independent solution, that would be the answers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot to mention, I understand [tex]J_{-p}[/tex] is independent only if p is not an integer, you have to use Bessel function of second kind...Y as the second linearly independent solution. In that case, you are stuck with Y.

But in here, you don't need to. I guess my ultimate question is why people even use Y when p is not an integer to make their life more complicated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K