Solution Stoichiometry Question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter justinh8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
To solve the stoichiometry problem involving sodium hydroxide and aluminum nitrate, first calculate the moles of each reactant. The reaction produces aluminum hydroxide as a precipitate, so determining the limiting reagent is crucial. After identifying the limiting reagent, calculate the amount of precipitate formed and then find the remaining concentrations of the ions in solution. Understanding the stoichiometric ratios and how they affect the final concentrations is key to solving this type of problem. This approach will clarify the remaining ion concentrations after the reaction.
justinh8
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Solution Stoichiometry Question?

Homework Statement



When 300 mL of a 2 M solution of sodium hydroxide is mixed with 500 mL of 1M aluminum Nitrate a precipitate results. Determine the concentrations of all ions remaining in solution.

I can do easier versions of these kinds of questions but its just the limiting reagents that throws me off. Please help and explain
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Start with a reverse problem - how much precipitate is produced?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to Solve Simple Stoichiometry Problems Involving Solvents?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Help w/ Molarity Question Related to a CuSO4 Solution
Replies
8
Views
4K
Question Related To Volume Strength Of H2O2.
Replies
3
Views
6K
What error did i make? (stoichiometry)
Replies
10
Views
2K
Creating a buffer out of 0.100M solutions
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry How to take into account autoprotolysis in weak base solution?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Calculating concentration of product & mass of a precipitate
Replies
1
Views
3K
Ascorbic Acid Amount Calculation (stoichiometry/)
Replies
4
Views
39K
Chemistry Determining the concentration of ions in ppm
Replies
8
Views
3K
Chemistry What precipitates form by mixing 2 saturated solutions?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top