Solutions for nonrelativistic-matter perturbations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around nonrelativistic-matter perturbations in the context of cosmic expansion, specifically analyzing a differential equation related to density perturbations. The original poster references documents from Caltech and Cambridge to explore the relationship between initial conditions and the transfer function in cosmological perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the derivation of a specific equation related to density perturbations and questions the connection between initial conditions and the transfer function. They propose potential forms for the transfer function based on wavelength considerations. Other participants provide context about the Meszaros equation and related cosmological parameters, suggesting pathways for further exploration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's queries, providing insights into the equations and parameters involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the derivation of certain terms, while the original poster expresses uncertainty about their understanding, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential homework constraints, though the original poster clarifies that their question stems from a specific example rather than a formal homework assignment. The discussion includes references to specific documents and equations that may not be fully explained within the thread.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Solutions for nonrelativistic-matter perturbations
Relevant Equations
##\delta'' + \frac{2+3y}{2y(1+y)}\delta' - \frac{3}{2y(1+y)}\delta = 0##

##y=\frac{a}{a_{eq}}##
I'm studying the nonrelativistic-matter perturbations if the expansion of the Universe is driven by a combination of components.

I'm currently Following this document (The growth of density perturbations) from Caltech. However, the author doesn't explain how he has found the solutions for the following expression that can be found in page 5.

##\delta'' + \frac{2+3y}{2y(1+y)}\delta' - \frac{3}{2y(1+y)}\delta = 0##

##y=\frac{a}{a_{eq}}##

Moreover, I found those notes (University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos) from David Tong at Cambridge explaining the transfer function (p.146).

Thus, I'm wondering if there is a relationship between the initial conditions and the transfer function. However, the first document doesn't mention the initial conditions for the solutions.

My thoughts are that we can find 2 independents solutions, one for small wavelengths and one for long wavelength as explained by Tong. Thus, #T(k) \approx C# for long wavelengths and #T(K) \approx C ln(a?)# for short for small wavelengths.

Furthermore, if the transfer function is defined as follow.

##\delta(\vec{k},t_0) = T(k)\delta(\vec{k},t_i)##

Does it means that #T(k)# acts as the constant in the particular solution?

I might be totally wrong. There is a lot of guesses here, since I'm unsure to understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the Meszaros equation for the growth of matter perturbations. When you combine the continuity and Euler equations for pressureless perturbations you get$$\delta_{m}'' + \mathcal{H} \delta_m' - 4\pi G a^2 \bar{\rho}_m \delta_m = 0$$where ##\mathcal{H} \equiv aH## (in cosmological perturbation theory we generally work with this so-called conformal Hubble parameter). The Friedmann equation is$$\mathcal{H}^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}a^2(\rho_m + \rho_r)$$You have already come across the parameter ##y = a/a_{eq}##, where ##a_{eq}## is the scale-factor at matter-radiation equality. Because ##\rho_m = \rho_{eq} y^{-3}## and ##\rho_r = \rho_{eq} y^{-4}## (remembering the scalings), check that you can in fact write the Friedmann equation in the form$$\mathcal{H}^2 = \mathcal{H}_0^2 \frac{\Omega_{m0}^2}{\Omega_{r0}}(y^{-1} + y^{-2})$$where

##\Omega_{m0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{m0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2}\rho_{eq} a_{eq}^3##
and
##\Omega_{r0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{r0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{eq} a_{eq}^4##

as per usual. Now you are almost ready to calculate ##\delta_m'## and ##\delta_m''##. Remember that the prime indicates derivation with respect to conformal time ##d\eta = dt/a##, so you can check that$$\frac{d}{d\eta} = y \mathcal{H} \frac{d}{dy}$$OK, so now you can use this to figure out ##\delta_m'## and ##\delta_m''##, by making use of the expression above for ##\mathcal{H}## in terms of ##y##. Be warned that you will need to do some slightly tedious simplification.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
PeterDonis said:
@happyparticle is this a homework problem?
Not exactly. However, it's a question about a specific example from the document.
I guess it is like a homework question.

@ergospherical Thank you again.
Your explanation helped me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K