Solutions for nonrelativistic-matter perturbations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on nonrelativistic-matter perturbations in the context of cosmic expansion, specifically analyzing the equation ##\delta'' + \frac{2+3y}{2y(1+y)}\delta' - \frac{3}{2y(1+y)}\delta = 0##. The participants reference the document "The growth of density perturbations" from Caltech and notes from David Tong at Cambridge regarding the transfer function. They explore the relationship between initial conditions and the transfer function, concluding that ##T(k)## acts as a constant in the particular solution for density perturbations, as described by the Meszaros equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological perturbation theory
  • Familiarity with the Friedmann equation and its components
  • Knowledge of the Meszaros equation for growth of matter perturbations
  • Basic grasp of transfer functions in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Meszaros equation in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the transfer function ##T(k)## in cosmological models
  • Investigate the role of initial conditions in density perturbation growth
  • Examine the continuity and Euler equations for pressureless perturbations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of cosmic structure formation and the mathematical modeling of density perturbations in the universe.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Solutions for nonrelativistic-matter perturbations
Relevant Equations
##\delta'' + \frac{2+3y}{2y(1+y)}\delta' - \frac{3}{2y(1+y)}\delta = 0##

##y=\frac{a}{a_{eq}}##
I'm studying the nonrelativistic-matter perturbations if the expansion of the Universe is driven by a combination of components.

I'm currently Following this document (The growth of density perturbations) from Caltech. However, the author doesn't explain how he has found the solutions for the following expression that can be found in page 5.

##\delta'' + \frac{2+3y}{2y(1+y)}\delta' - \frac{3}{2y(1+y)}\delta = 0##

##y=\frac{a}{a_{eq}}##

Moreover, I found those notes (University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos) from David Tong at Cambridge explaining the transfer function (p.146).

Thus, I'm wondering if there is a relationship between the initial conditions and the transfer function. However, the first document doesn't mention the initial conditions for the solutions.

My thoughts are that we can find 2 independents solutions, one for small wavelengths and one for long wavelength as explained by Tong. Thus, #T(k) \approx C# for long wavelengths and #T(K) \approx C ln(a?)# for short for small wavelengths.

Furthermore, if the transfer function is defined as follow.

##\delta(\vec{k},t_0) = T(k)\delta(\vec{k},t_i)##

Does it means that #T(k)# acts as the constant in the particular solution?

I might be totally wrong. There is a lot of guesses here, since I'm unsure to understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the Meszaros equation for the growth of matter perturbations. When you combine the continuity and Euler equations for pressureless perturbations you get$$\delta_{m}'' + \mathcal{H} \delta_m' - 4\pi G a^2 \bar{\rho}_m \delta_m = 0$$where ##\mathcal{H} \equiv aH## (in cosmological perturbation theory we generally work with this so-called conformal Hubble parameter). The Friedmann equation is$$\mathcal{H}^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}a^2(\rho_m + \rho_r)$$You have already come across the parameter ##y = a/a_{eq}##, where ##a_{eq}## is the scale-factor at matter-radiation equality. Because ##\rho_m = \rho_{eq} y^{-3}## and ##\rho_r = \rho_{eq} y^{-4}## (remembering the scalings), check that you can in fact write the Friedmann equation in the form$$\mathcal{H}^2 = \mathcal{H}_0^2 \frac{\Omega_{m0}^2}{\Omega_{r0}}(y^{-1} + y^{-2})$$where

##\Omega_{m0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{m0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2}\rho_{eq} a_{eq}^3##
and
##\Omega_{r0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{r0} = \frac{8\pi G}{3\mathcal{H}_0^2} \rho_{eq} a_{eq}^4##

as per usual. Now you are almost ready to calculate ##\delta_m'## and ##\delta_m''##. Remember that the prime indicates derivation with respect to conformal time ##d\eta = dt/a##, so you can check that$$\frac{d}{d\eta} = y \mathcal{H} \frac{d}{dy}$$OK, so now you can use this to figure out ##\delta_m'## and ##\delta_m''##, by making use of the expression above for ##\mathcal{H}## in terms of ##y##. Be warned that you will need to do some slightly tedious simplification.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
PeterDonis said:
@happyparticle is this a homework problem?
Not exactly. However, it's a question about a specific example from the document.
I guess it is like a homework question.

@ergospherical Thank you again.
Your explanation helped me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K