Solve 3D Plane Intersection & Reflection: Steps Included!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Plane
Saad
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have a unit test on 3D-Planes coming up! And I was wondering if in 3D, a line and a plane intersect at a single point. How would you determine the equation of the reflection of the line in the plane?
Please try to provide the steps. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, a plane and a line intersect in one point. Let's say you have the plane:
\pi : 7x + 8y + 9z + 10 = 0
And the line:
\underline{l} = (1, 2, 3) + t(4, 5, 6)
You know that the X, Y and Z coordinates of every point on the line are:
x = 1 + 4t
y = 2 + 5t
z = 3 + 6t
Substitute these in the equation of the plane and you will get:
7(1 + 4t) + 8(2 + 5t) + 9(3 + 6t) + 10 = 0
One unknown - t. Find it and you can find the coordinates of the intersection point.
 
really appreciate it, this was helpful! thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top