Solve a Simple Work Problem and Find Out Why You're Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laban
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work problem
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the work done on a 6.75 kg bucket being raised 4 meters using a rope over a frictionless pulley. The correct force needed to lift the bucket is calculated as 66.15 N, leading to a work output of 264.6 J. The claim that the answer should be 3.6 J is deemed incorrect by participants in the discussion. The confusion stems from a misunderstanding of the problem rather than an error in the calculations. The initial calculations for work done are accurate, confirming that the problem is indeed simple and correctly solved.
Laban
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello :)
I must have missed something. This problem is extremely simple and yet I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Really frustrating!

The problem:
A bucket of mass 6.75 kg hangs in a well at the end of a rope. The rope passes over a frictionless pulley at the top of the well, and you pull horizontally on the end of the rope to raise the bucket slowly a distance of 4 m.

How much work do you do on the bucket in pulling it up?

My Guess
Since you need to raise the bucket, you need to pull with a force that equals the downwards gravitational force on the bucket. This is 6.75*9.8 = 66.15 N.
Now you pull it a distance of 4 m. This is 66.15*4 = 264.6 J.

But this is wrong! It's supposed to be 3.6 J


What am I supposed to do, and more importantly, why is what I'm doing wrong? This is supposed to be so simple >.<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is simple and you're doing it correctly. That 3.6 J answer is bogus.
 
You have solved the problem correctly. 3.6 J is incorrect.
 
I sure hope you're both right. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top