MHB Solve Algebra Word Problem: Overpayment Amount of \$85.00

AI Thread Summary
The March bill was $400.00, with 25% due, equating to $100.00. A recurring overpayment of $85.00 should have resulted in a payment of $15.00. Instead, an incorrect calculation led to a payment of $78.75 after subtracting the overpayment from the total bill. This results in an overpayment of $63.75 compared to the correct amount owed. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the total overpayment based on differing calculations.
moore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
March bill was \$400.00 for 25% to be paid of that. There is a recurring overpayment amount of \$85.00 so \$85.00 was to be withdrawn from the 25% of \$400.00 for a total of \$15.00.

\$400.00 x .25 = \$100.00

\$100.00 - \$85.00 = \$15.00

However, rather than doing that; the following was done:

\$400.00 - \$85.00 = \$315.00
\$315.00 x .25 = \$78.75

How much has been overpaid now?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
moore said:
March bill was $400.00 for 25% to be paid of that. There is a recurring overpayment amount of $85.00 so $85.00 was to be withdrawn from the 25% of $400.00 for a total of $15.00.

$400.00 x .25 = $100.00

$100.00 - $85.00 = $15.00

However, rather than doing that; the following was done:

$400.00 - $85.00 = $315.00
$315.00 x .25 = $78.75

How much has been overpaid now?
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? According to your original computation, you should have paid 15.00. But if you paid according to the second (incorrect) calculation you would pay 78.75. You would have overpaid by 78.75- 15.00= 63.75.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? According to your original computation, you should have paid 15.00. But if you paid according to the second (incorrect) calculation you would pay 78.75. You would have overpaid by 78.75- 15.00= 63.75.

\$63.75?; but \$85.00 were overpaid and now $78.75 were overpaid.

Wouldn't it be more?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top