MHB Solve Algebra Word Problem: Overpayment Amount of \$85.00

moore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
March bill was \$400.00 for 25% to be paid of that. There is a recurring overpayment amount of \$85.00 so \$85.00 was to be withdrawn from the 25% of \$400.00 for a total of \$15.00.

\$400.00 x .25 = \$100.00

\$100.00 - \$85.00 = \$15.00

However, rather than doing that; the following was done:

\$400.00 - \$85.00 = \$315.00
\$315.00 x .25 = \$78.75

How much has been overpaid now?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
moore said:
March bill was $400.00 for 25% to be paid of that. There is a recurring overpayment amount of $85.00 so $85.00 was to be withdrawn from the 25% of $400.00 for a total of $15.00.

$400.00 x .25 = $100.00

$100.00 - $85.00 = $15.00

However, rather than doing that; the following was done:

$400.00 - $85.00 = $315.00
$315.00 x .25 = $78.75

How much has been overpaid now?
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? According to your original computation, you should have paid 15.00. But if you paid according to the second (incorrect) calculation you would pay 78.75. You would have overpaid by 78.75- 15.00= 63.75.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? According to your original computation, you should have paid 15.00. But if you paid according to the second (incorrect) calculation you would pay 78.75. You would have overpaid by 78.75- 15.00= 63.75.

\$63.75?; but \$85.00 were overpaid and now $78.75 were overpaid.

Wouldn't it be more?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top