I Solve Algebraic Equation: ax^(n-1) - x + 1 - a = 0

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wuberdall
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the algebraic equation ax^(n-1) - x + 1 - a = 0, where x = 1 is identified as a trivial solution. Another proposed solution is x = 1 - (2a(n-1)-2)/(a(n-2)(n-1)), but doubts are raised about its validity. A participant suggests simplifying the equation by dividing it by (x-1) to obtain a lower power of x, particularly for cases like n = 3. The conversation emphasizes the need for further exploration of the equation's structure to find additional solutions. Overall, the participants are seeking clarity on the equation's solutions and simplifications.
Wuberdall
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm currently studying percolation theory and here I'm stuck on the this "simple" algebraic equation
ax^{n-1} - x +1 - a = 0
clearly, the trivial solution x = 1 solves it. But I'm told that
x = 1 - \frac{2a(n-1)-2}{a(n-2)(n-1)}
is another solution. This makes we wonder, if the equation can be put into a simpler form (e.g. quadratic or cubic) — even though I haven't succeed to.

Can any of you help ??

Thaks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think that the statement is true. With a=4, n=4, I get x=1/12 and f(1/12) = -1331/432
 
Wuberdall said:
clearly, the trivial solution x = 1 solves it.

Then you can obtain an equation in a lower power of x by dividing the original equation by (x-1). Try that for a particular case like n = 3.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top