Solve Beer's Law Problem: Fe2+ Spectral Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot59
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Beer’s Law problem related to the spectral analysis of Fe2+ ions. The absorbance is noted at 0.393, with a calculated concentration of 3.1662x10-5M after applying the linear equation y=mx+b. The user seeks to determine the mass of iron in the original sample while considering multiple dilutions in the lab procedure. It is suggested that instead of calculating each dilution separately, the final volume can be used to simplify the process. This approach allows for treating the entire dilution process as a single step for easier calculations.
Lancelot59
Messages
640
Reaction score
1
I'm having an issue solving a problem involving beers law. It's the specral analysis of a sample containing Fe2+ ions.

Absorbancy: 0.393
Mass Sample: 0.1950
Slope: 0.2200 mg Fe2+/L
y Intercept=0.004

So I worked y=mx+b to work out that there was 1.76818182 mg Fe+2/L

Then I converted to grams, and from there I divided by the molar mass of iron to get a concentration of 3.1662x10-5M.

I need to find the mass of Iron in the original sample. The lab procedure lists a whole bunch of dilutions that occur along the way. Adding some 1,10-phenanthroline, sodium acetate, and some other things. Do I really need to work all the dilutions back, or is there another way to get the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to account for all dilutions. That is - could be you don't have to calculate every single one separately, if you are given information that allows calculation of the final volume of the sample, you can use it and treat whole process of diluting as a one step.

--
 
That works. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top