MHB Solve Blackjack Probability: No Dealer/Player Blackjacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability that neither a player nor a dealer is dealt a blackjack in a freshly shuffled deck. The initial formula presented for the probability of both getting a blackjack includes a factor of 3, which participants clarify relates to the order of drawing cards. They suggest using combinations to simplify the calculation and confirm that both methods yield the same probability result. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding card order and the different ways to represent the probability mathematically. Ultimately, the participants agree on the correct approach to find the desired probability.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have this simple question:

Suppose that you are playing blackjack against a dealer. In a freshly shuffled deck, what is the probability that neither you nor the dealer is dealt a blackjack?

In order to solve the problem, I need the probability of both me and the dealer GETTING a blackjack. The probability is:

\[\frac{4}{52}\cdot \frac{4}{51}\cdot \frac{16}{50}\cdot \frac{15}{49}\cdot 3\]

and I don't understand where the 3 comes from.

Can you assist please ?

Thank you !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have to run but I want to comment that with card problems I like using combinations, because this takes care of the ordering issue inherently. If you count the cards like you are doing you will have to account for the order at the end.

For example the probability of one player getting blackjack is:

$$\frac{\binom{4}{1} \binom{4}{1}}{\binom{52}{2}}$$

Using the same logic, what is the probability of both you and the dealer getting blackjack? Let's see if we get the same answer two different ways. :)
 
how can this be the probability of getting a blackjack ? You need 1 card out of 4 aces and 1 card out of 16 possibilities: 4 K's, 4 Q's 4 J's and 4 10's
 
Yankel said:
how can this be the probability of getting a blackjack ? You need 1 card out of 4 aces and 1 card out of 16 possibilities: 4 K's, 4 Q's 4 J's and 4 10's

By your description I thought you were looking for just the AJ combos. If you are using A10, AJ, AQ, or AK then you are correct it would be:

$$\displaystyle \frac{\binom{4}{1} \binom{16}{1}}{\binom{52}{2}}$$

As for your main question, you are looking for $P(B_{p}' \cap P_{d}')$, where $B_{p}$ is the event you receive a blackjack and $B_{d}$ is the event the dealer receives a blackjack. To find this I would use this fact: $P(B_{p} \cup P_{d})'=P(B_{p}' \cap P_{d}')$. If you find the probability that either you or the dealer receives a blackjack, then you can just take the complement for the final answer. Have you made any progress on this question? :)
 
Yankel said:
Suppose that you are playing blackjack against a dealer. In a freshly shuffled deck, what is the probability that neither you nor the dealer is dealt a blackjack?

In order to solve the problem, I need the probability of both me and the dealer GETTING a blackjack. The probability is:

\[\frac{4}{52}\cdot \frac{4}{51}\cdot \frac{16}{50}\cdot \frac{15}{49}\cdot 3\]

and I don't understand where the 3 comes from.
I would prefer to write this as \[\frac{4}{52}\cdot \frac{3}{51}\cdot \frac{16}{50}\cdot \frac{15}{49}\cdot 4\] (with the $3$ and the $4$ interchanged). The reason that the $4$ goes down to $3$ in the second fraction is the same as the reason that the $16$ goes down to $15$ in the fourth fraction, namely that after the first ace is drawn there are only $3$ remaining aces to choose from.

So the real question is: what is the extra $4$ at the end doing? The answer to that is that there are four possible orders in which the cards $AX$ for the two players can be drawn (where $X$ denotes $10$, $J$, $Q$ or $K$). these orders are $$AX \quad AX,$$ $$AX \quad XA,$$ $$XA \quad AX,$$ $$XA \quad XA.$$
 
As always I enjoy readings Opalg's methods of these calculations because we approach these problems differently. :) Just to show the two methods work the same:

$$\frac{4}{52}\cdot \frac{3}{51}\cdot \frac{16}{50}\cdot \frac{15}{49}\cdot 4 = 0.001773017 $$
$$ \frac{\binom{4}{1}\binom{16}{1}\binom{3}{1}\binom{15}{1}}{\binom{52}{2}\binom{50}{2}} = 0.001773017$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top