Solve Coordinate System Problem: Find Acceleration & Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter frostchaos123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses connected by a cable over a pulley, where the goal is to find the acceleration of each mass and the tension in the cable. The problem is set within different coordinate systems, which raises questions about how these systems affect the equations governing the motion of the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of switching the coordinate system on the equations of motion. There are attempts to reformulate the equations based on the direction of the axes and discussions about the consistency of the acceleration's direction across the two masses.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the formulation of equations and the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses. There is recognition of the need for consistency in defining the direction of acceleration and tension, though no consensus has been reached on the final formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the direction of acceleration must be considered when formulating equations, and there is an acknowledgment of potential confusion arising from the choice of coordinate systems. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the physical meaning of the variables involved.

frostchaos123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, wondering if anyone can help me with this little problem...

An object with mass m1 , resting on a frictionless horizontal table, is connected to a cable that passes over a pulley and then is fastened to a hanging object with mass m2. Find the acceleration of each object and the tension in the cable.For this coordinate system, where the x-axis is pointing to the right, which is the positive, and the y-axis is pointing downwards, which is positive: http://www.imagehosting.com/show.php/1011793_Coordinate.bmp.html

Given that T is the tension, the equations should be:
m1*(a) = T;
m2*(a) = -T + m2*(g);

However, if i switch the x-axis from pointing rightwards to pointing leftwards, i will get this: http://www.imagehosting.com/show.php/1011808_Coordinate1.bmp.html

The equations become:
m1*(a) = -T;
m2*(a) = -T + m2*(g);

I am confused as to how to solve this using the 2nd coordinate system, as i feel that coordinates should not affect the answer.

My question is that what is it that is wrong in my equations that i cannot get the answer? Or is it possible that this assumption is flawed? I feel that maybe the tension have to opposite each other (having opposite signs) regardless of coordinates, but i am not very sure.

Thanks to all for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
frostchaos123 said:
However, if i switch the x-axis from pointing rightwards to pointing leftwards, i will get this: http://www.imagehosting.com/show.php/1011808_Coordinate1.bmp.html

The equations become:
m1*(a) = -T;
m2*(a) = -T + m2*(g);
What's the problem? You'll get a negative answer for "a", which means it points to the right.

Even better would be to let "a" be the magnitude of the acceleration. Since the tension points to the right of m1 and is called -T, the acceleration must also point to the right and should be called -a. (The same logic applies to the m2 acceleration.) That gives you the same equations you had before.
 
So in other words, I should reformulate them to become:

m1*(-a) = -T;
m2*(a) = -T + m2*(g) ?

But if it is true in this case, wouldn't the expression m1*(a) and m2*(a) require one to know before hand which direction would the acceleration points to?
 
frostchaos123 said:
So in other words, I should reformulate them to become:

m1*(-a) = -T;
m2*(a) = -T + m2*(g) ?
You forgot the minus sign before the "a" in the second equation.

But if it is true in this case, wouldn't the expression m1*(a) and m2*(a) require one to know before hand which direction would the acceleration points to?
You don't have to know which way the acceleration points. If you solved your second set of equations in your first post, you'd get a negative answer. Either way you get the correct answer.

Of course you should know the direction of the acceleration. If the tension pulls m1 to the right, then it accelerates to the right. :wink:

The really important thing is to be consistent in your two equations, so that "a" means the same thing in both.
 
You made a mistake with your second set of equations in the new coordinate system... If you presume that "a" is in the positive x direction (to the left) for m1, then you must label "a" as being in the -y direction for m2 (upward). Because the two accelerations are dependent on each other...

So those equations would be:

The equations become:
m1*(a) = -T;
m2*(-a) = -T + m2*(g);
 
Ah, Doc Al answered before me. :smile:
 
I see, thanks for all the replies. So basically, I have to consider that the acceleration for the m1 part and the m2 part as a whole and formulate them accordingly, while remembering what the "a" physically means.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K