Solve Einstein Field Equation without Vacuum Solution

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
How to solve EFE without using the vacuum solution like how you did in schwarzschild metric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean, how to solve the EFE for a general situation? If that is what you mean, probably using numerical methods and a computer.

If you mean something else, please say what.
 
DEvens said:
Do you mean, how to solve the EFE for a general situation? If that is what you mean, probably using numerical methods and a computer.

If you mean something else, please say what.
I am not sure why can we just use the vacuum solution to solve EFE? Why can't we use a nom zero stress momentum tensor to solve?
 
TimeRip496 said:
I am not sure why can we just use the vacuum solution to solve EFE? Why can't we use a non zero stress momentum tensor to solve?

The space outside the surface of an object floating in space (like a star or a planet) is vacuum so the stress-energy tensor there is zero. Thus, if we want a solution to the field equations that applies there we set ##T## equal to zero.

In other problems, for example a ball of dust collapsing under its own gravitational attraction to form a star or planet (google for "Oppenheimer-Snyder"), we don't have a vacuum and the stress energy tensor is not zero. Then we have to solve the field equation for a non-zero stress-energy tensor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TimeRip496
Nugatory said:
In other problems, for example a ball of dust collapsing under its own gravitational attraction to form a star or planet (google for "Oppenheimer-Snyder"), we don't have a vacuum and the stress energy tensor is not zero. Then we have to solve the field equation for a non-zero stress-energy tensor.

Another example is the solutions describing the universe as a whole.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top