Solve Einstein Field Equation without Vacuum Solution

TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
How to solve EFE without using the vacuum solution like how you did in schwarzschild metric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean, how to solve the EFE for a general situation? If that is what you mean, probably using numerical methods and a computer.

If you mean something else, please say what.
 
DEvens said:
Do you mean, how to solve the EFE for a general situation? If that is what you mean, probably using numerical methods and a computer.

If you mean something else, please say what.
I am not sure why can we just use the vacuum solution to solve EFE? Why can't we use a nom zero stress momentum tensor to solve?
 
TimeRip496 said:
I am not sure why can we just use the vacuum solution to solve EFE? Why can't we use a non zero stress momentum tensor to solve?

The space outside the surface of an object floating in space (like a star or a planet) is vacuum so the stress-energy tensor there is zero. Thus, if we want a solution to the field equations that applies there we set ##T## equal to zero.

In other problems, for example a ball of dust collapsing under its own gravitational attraction to form a star or planet (google for "Oppenheimer-Snyder"), we don't have a vacuum and the stress energy tensor is not zero. Then we have to solve the field equation for a non-zero stress-energy tensor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TimeRip496
Nugatory said:
In other problems, for example a ball of dust collapsing under its own gravitational attraction to form a star or planet (google for "Oppenheimer-Snyder"), we don't have a vacuum and the stress energy tensor is not zero. Then we have to solve the field equation for a non-zero stress-energy tensor.

Another example is the solutions describing the universe as a whole.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top