Solve Enjoyable Enigmas with Mr.E's Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enigman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The forum thread invites puzzle enthusiasts to share various types of puzzles, including cryptograms and whodunnits, while emphasizing that participants should know the answers without resorting to online searches. A code message is presented, which participants attempt to decode, leading to discussions about its meaning and possible interpretations. Participants also engage in solving additional puzzles, such as cutting a cake into pieces with minimal cuts and a physics challenge involving water and matchsticks. The conversation highlights the enjoyment of problem-solving and the creative thinking required to tackle these enigmas. Overall, the thread fosters a collaborative atmosphere for sharing and solving intriguing puzzles.
  • #331
The blind man sings.. Loudly. :p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #332
Gad said:
The blind man sings.. Loudly. :p

He's deaf. Deaf people don't sing.
 
  • #333
Finer point about man crossing road-
I added the bit about the starlight to make the problem harder. Starlight does reach us during the day although it is overpowered by the sun.
Solve this one. It is kinda hard, but if you solve it you will feel really smart.(For a day that is :biggrin:)

Two identical spheres receive identical amounts of thermal energy, the heat transfer occurring so quickly that none is lost to the surroundings. If they begin at the same temperature, but one is on a table and the other is suspended by a string, will the spheres still have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy?
 
  • #334
consciousness said:
A physics enigma-

Two identical spheres receive identical amounts of thermal energy, the heat transfer occurring so quickly that none is lost to the surroundings. If they begin at the same temperature, but one is on a table and the other is suspended by a string, will the spheres still have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy?

Yes, they will have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy -- a transfer that was such that no heat was exchanged with the surrounding environment.

This assumes that the string and the table are part of the environment, and thus were not involved in any heat transfer. This includes any possible ionization effects: the string and table are part of the environment and were not affected by the heat transfer at all -- at least not yet.

This neglects any quantum effects of the different configurations, which wouldn't be measurable anyway if the spheres are at all larger than microscopic.

This also neglects any differences caused by general relativity (as opposed to Newtonian gravity), which wouldn't even come close to being measurable assuming the these are regular old objects, here on Earth.

And lastly it assumes that none of thermal energy is transferred to the surroundings via thermal vibrations -- again, no energy is transferred to the surroundings, and that includes the string and table.

Edit: Oh, and of course I don't mean that the spheres will have the same temperature that they started with. I mean they will have the same temperature as each other.
 
Last edited:
  • #335
consciousness said:
Two identical spheres receive identical amounts of thermal energy, the heat transfer occurring so quickly that none is lost to the surroundings. If they begin at the same temperature, but one is on a table and the other is suspended by a string, will the spheres still have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy?

collinsmark said:
Yes, they will have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy -- a transfer that was such that no heat was exchanged with the surrounding environment.

This assumes that the string and the table are part of the environment, and thus were not involved in any heat transfer. This includes any possible ionization effects: the string and table are part of the environment and were not affected by the heat transfer at all -- at least not yet.

This neglects any quantum effects of the different configurations, which wouldn't be measurable anyway if the spheres are at all larger than microscopic.

This also neglects any differences caused by general relativity (as opposed to Newtonian gravity), which wouldn't even come close to being measurable assuming the these are regular old objects, here on Earth.

And lastly it assumes that none of thermal energy is transferred to the surroundings via thermal vibrations -- again, no energy is transferred to the surroundings, and that includes the string and table.

Edit: Oh, and of course I don't mean that the spheres will have the same temperature that they started with. I mean they will have the same temperature as each other.

That last post also assumed that the two spheres were identical at the time the heat transfer, and at the time temperature measurements were taking place.

But now I think I see where this riddle is going.

I think the riddle meant to say, "the spheres are not ideal sphere's. Instead they are practical spheres that are not completely rigid. And they are identical before being placed on the string or the table, but not necessarily after."

If that were the case then the sphere hanging on the string would tend to "stretch out" ever so slightly, while the sphere on the table would tend to compress upon itself every so slightly. Thus the spheres wouldn't technically be identical anymore at the time they were hanging from a string or sitting on a table.

In that case, the sphere on the table would be slightly denser, containing a slightly larger energy density, and be slightly hotter.
 
  • #336
collinsmark, this is a very practical riddle. Nowhere in the problem statement have the spheres been called "ideal". You have to take practical considerations into mind while solving this one. You are on the right track, almost.
I don't understand the last part about compression though. Why would it compress? I think you are ignoring a very practical consideration here.
 
  • #337
I have not been contributing enough riddles, so I went to the library today and got a book.

Here's one:

"An ordinary cyclist travels up and down a hill. Going up, she maintains a constant speed of 10 mph. It takes her 1 hour to get to the top. Assuming the hill is symmetric, what speed must she maintain on the way going down if she wishes to average 20 mph?"
 
  • #338
∞?
 
  • #339
consciousness, I have trouble reconciling "two identical spheres" and "these spheres are not perfect spheres".
 
  • #340
Your light switch is on the other side of the room from your bed. However, you make a bet that you can turn the light off and jump in bed before the room gets dark. No timers are involved. How do you win this bet without violating SR?
 
  • #341
Boomerang Ball:

You throw a ball as hard as you can. It doesn't hit anything, and no strings or rubber bands are attached to it, yet, it comes right back to you. How can this be?
 
  • #342
You are standing on a hard concrete floor and you have no cushioning to use. You bet someone you can drop a raw egg 4 feet without it breaking. You promise you won't even drop it on your feet. How do you win this bet?
 
  • #343
zoobyshoe said:
Boomerang Ball:

You throw a ball as hard as you can. It doesn't hit anything, and no strings or rubber bands are attached to it, yet, it comes right back to you. How can this be?

Is there not a word for 'vertical relative to Earth's surface'? In my language there's vertical, and there's this word which means vertical relative to Earth's surface..
 
  • #344
Gad said:
Is there not a word for 'vertical relative to Earth's surface'? In my language there's vertical, and there's this word which means vertical relative to Earth's surface..

...Up?
 
Last edited:
  • #345
Lol :smile:
 
  • #346
Gad said:
Is there not a word for 'vertical relative to Earth's surface'? In my language there's vertical, and there's this word which means vertical relative to Earth's surface..
In physics any line that is perpendicular to a given surface is "normal" to that surface. The word "up" would have done just fine, though I wish it hadn't been blurted out without spoilers.
 
  • #347
zoobyshoe said:
I have not been contributing enough riddles, so I went to the library today and got a book.

Here's one:

"An ordinary cyclist travels up and down a hill. Going up, she maintains a constant speed of 10 mph. It takes her 1 hour to get to the top. Assuming the hill is symmetric, what speed must she maintain on the way going down if she wishes to average 20 mph?"
teleportation allowed?

zoobyshoe said:
Your light switch is on the other side of the room from your bed. However, you make a bet that you can turn the light off and jump in bed before the room gets dark. No timers are involved. How do you win this bet without violating SR?
use a torch? It was a day?

zoobyshoe said:
You are standing on a hard concrete floor and you have no cushioning to use. You bet someone you can drop a raw egg 4 feet without it breaking. You promise you won't even drop it on your feet. How do you win this bet?
Er, catch it before it falls?
 
  • #348
My question was somewhat ambiguous. I have edited it now.

Two identical metal spheres receive identical amounts of thermal energy, the heat transfer occurring so quickly that none is lost to the surroundings. If they begin at the same temperature, but one is on a table and the other is suspended by a string, will the spheres still have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy?

I have another answer for raw egg-
Concrete floors aren't so easily broken!

Cyclist-
Its not possible!:eek:

Hint for spheres-
Metals appreciably expand on heating
 

Attachments

  • download (1).jpg
    download (1).jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 372
  • #349
consciousness said:
My question was somewhat ambiguous. I have edited it now.

Two identical metal spheres receive identical amounts of thermal energy, the heat transfer occurring so quickly that none is lost to the surroundings. If they begin at the same temperature, but one is on a table and the other is suspended by a string, will the spheres still have the same temperature immediately after the quick addition of thermal energy?
[...]
Hint for spheres-
Metals appreciably expand on heating
Assuming now that both spheres maintain identical densities with respect to each other, and have positive thermal expansion coefficients (unlike zirconium tungstate), then the sphere on the string will be the hotter of the two.

Conservation of energy is at play here. The average height of the sphere on the table will rise up a bit, while the sphere on the string will be lowered. The difference in potential energy equates to work done by a heat engine, essentially. The end result is, for the moment at least, the sphere that gains potential energy is the colder of the two, meaning that the sphere on the string is hotter than the one on that table, since the sphere on the string lost potential energy and the sphere on the table gained potential energy in the process.
 
  • #350
collinsmark said:
Assuming now that both spheres maintain identical densities with respect to each other, and have positive thermal expansion coefficients (unlike zirconium tungstate), then the sphere on the string will be the hotter of the two.

Conservation of energy is at play here. The average height of the sphere on the table will rise up a bit, while the sphere on the string will be lowered. The difference in potential energy equates to work done by a heat engine, essentially. The end result is, for the moment at least, the sphere that gains potential energy is the colder of the two, meaning that the sphere on the string is hotter than the one on that table, since the sphere on the string lost potential energy and the sphere on the table gained potential energy in the process.

Correct. :biggrin:
 
  • #351
Here's one that I made up myself, many years ago.

You work at a pawn shop. Some guy comes in and wants to pawn off an old war medal.

He says, "This is my great grand-dad's medal that he got in World War I. And it's a really special medal too; it was made with a personal inscription when he got it, by a General! This has got to be worth a lot!"

You look over the medal. It's a circular medal with an eagle on the front of it. On the back of it you can read the inscription,

Sergeant Smith,
Thank you for your courage
and bravery in World War I.
-General Jones,
April 20, 1917​

You don't know how much to give him for the medal, so you ask you manager (the owner of the pawn shop) to take a look at it. He looks it over for a moment, and says to the man, "This is worthless. I'm not giving you a cent for this." And the man takes the medal back and walks out of the shop.

Why did your manager say it's worthless?

--------------------

Just to answer some of the more low-hanging-fruit questions:

You ask your manager, "did WWI medals not have eagles on them?"
He replies, "I really don't know. Could be. The truth is I really don't know much about WWI medals, or even WWI in general. You would think I would, owning a pawn shop and all. But the truth is I don't. It's not my area of expertise," he pauses, "but I know that was fake."

You ask your manager, "did WWI medals not have inscriptions on them?"
He replies again, "I really don't know. Maybe so, maybe not. -- That one was fake though."

You ask your manager, "was there not a General Jones in WWI?"
He says, "I really don't know. Like I said, I don't know a whole lot about WWI."

[Edit: Corrected spelling of "Sergeant."]
 
Last edited:
  • #352
I know this one...the one I read was about a sword not a medal though.
 
  • #353
Enigman said:
teleportation allowed?
Right idea

use a torch? It was a day?
both correct

Er, catch it before it falls?
This is correct, but there's another different solution.
 
  • #354
consciousness said:
I have another answer for raw egg-
Concrete floors aren't so easily broken!
Correct. But there's yet another solution.

Cyclist-
Its not possible!:eek:
Yes, best answer.
 
  • #355
Gad said:
∞?

right idea
 
  • #356
zoobyshoe said:
You are standing on a hard concrete floor and you have no cushioning to use. You bet someone you can drop a raw egg 4 feet without it breaking. You promise you won't even drop it on your feet. How do you win this bet?

Drop the egg on the feet of the person you made the bet with? Depending on his reflexes he might catch it or else well, some things are worth losing a bet for...
:devil:
 
  • #357
Another answer to raw egg-
I thought about the possibility of hard raw eggs and the ostrich came to mind. The trick is to procure an ostrich egg (from some where!). You can can throw it on concrete and it probably won't break. Apparently it requires a hammer and a drill to break! :eek:
 
  • #358
For the WW1 puzzle:
Is it because sergeant is spelled incorrectly, or was that just a mistake in the typing of the puzzle? Alternatively, that date is only two weeks after the US declared war, so it seems possible that no US troops had actually seen combat by that point (I admit I had to google when the US entered to confirm this)
 
  • #359
Office_Shredder said:
For the WW1 puzzle:
Is it because sergeant is spelled incorrectly, or was that just a mistake in the typing of the puzzle? Alternatively, that date is only two weeks after the US declared war, so it seems possible that no US troops had actually seen combat by that point (I admit I had to google when the US entered to confirm this)

No.
(collinsmark isn't online now so I am taking the liberty to answer for him. Sorry, collinsmark.)
 
  • #360
WW1 solution:
Oh, obviously it was called world war 1 until after world war 2 started.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
12K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
13K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
15K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K