Solve Exponential Equations: e^x, e^-x, ln 6 | Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philoctetes3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving exponential equations, specifically involving expressions like e^x, e^-x, and their relationship to the natural logarithm. Participants are examining the steps taken to manipulate the equation e^x + e^-x = 6.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are reviewing the steps taken in the manipulation of the original equation, questioning the validity of transitions between lines. There is a focus on recognizing the form of the resulting equation and considering substitutions to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the quadratic nature of the equation and the potential use of the quadratic formula, though no consensus or final solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of confusion regarding the steps taken in the problem-solving process, particularly in the transition from one line to another. Participants are also expressing concern about the accuracy of their approximations and the clarity of the original problem statement.

Philoctetes3
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just want to make sure that I have this in the correct order. The book I have is very unclear.

e^x + e^-x = 6
e^x + 1/e^x = 6
e^2x + 1 = 6e^x
e^2x/e^x + 1 = 6
x = ln 6

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've made a mistake. The fourth line doesn't follow from the third. It looks like you tried to divide by e^x (which is actually just undoing what you did in going from line 2 to 3), but you forgot to divide the 1 by e^x.

What you should do is rearrange your third line so that it looks like

e^(2x) - 6e^x + 1 = 0.

Does this look like a familar sort of equation? (If not, let y = e^x. Then does it look familar?)
 
Thanks a lot. I thought something looked off. The thing that worried me is that the answer that I got is quite approximate, and I wanted to make sure that I was doing the process correctly, which I wasn't.

Then after this I would simply do the U form of the quadratic, correct?
 
Yes, the equation is quadratic in form, so a substitution will make it a quadratic, which you can solve using the quadratic formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K