Solve Exponents Question: 333333/33 Remainder Value

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheExibo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
TheExibo
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
If you divide 333333 by 33, what is the value of the remainder?

I'm not sure where to starte since this number can't be put into a calculator. Is there something with logs? I was thinking of bringing the number down with logs to 333log333, but I'm confused as to where that will lead me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Write 333 in prime number factors and see if that helps.
 
TheExibo said:
If you divide 333333 by 33, what is the value of the remainder?

I'm not sure where to starte since this number can't be put into a calculator. Is there something with logs? I was thinking of bringing the number down with logs to 333log333, but I'm confused as to where that will lead me.
Taking the logarithm of 333^{333}, divided by 3, would give 333log(333)- log(3). The difficulty is that your calculator can only give a limited number of decimal places for the logarithm and multiplying by 333, then taking the exponential of the result, will make the "round off error" worse.
 
Do you know modulo arithmetic? You should look into that. (It's not very difficult, it's mainly just a handy notational system to make problems like these easier)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top