MHB Solve for q: Q=p-q/2 q=p-2Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter OMGMathPLS
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equations Q = p - q/2 and q = p - 2Q. Participants clarify that both expressions, p - 2Q and -2Q + p, represent the same value due to the commutative property of addition. The process of isolating q involves manipulating the equations through multiplication and addition to achieve the desired form. The rationale for adding q - 2Q to simplify the left side to just q is emphasized as a key step in solving the equation. Overall, the conversation highlights the flexibility in expressing equivalent mathematical solutions.
OMGMathPLS
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Solve for q:

Q=p-q/2

Correct answer :
p-2Q
or
-2Q+pHow can this answer be either p-2Q OR -2Q+p. I mean I can see they are the same value but how would you do it to get different answers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you mean:

Q=(p-q)/2

or:

$$Q=\frac{p-q}{2}$$

Multiply through by $2$:

$$2Q=p-q$$

Add $q-2Q$ to both sides:

$$q=p-2Q$$

Now, let's go back to:

$$Q=\frac{p-q}{2}$$

Multiply through by $-2$:

$$-2Q=q-p$$

Add $p$ to both sides:

$$-2Q+p=q$$

The form you get (assuming you use valid operations), and/or choose to use depends largely on you. The commutative law of addition results in:

$$p-2Q=-2Q+p$$

Personally, I avoid the use of leading negatives whenever possible. :D
 
Thanks.Why did you add q-2Q to both sides?
 
OMGMathPLS said:
Thanks.Why did you add q-2Q to both sides?

Doing so resulted in the left side of the equation having just $q$ in it, which is what we want, as we are solving for $q$.. :D
 
Q=(p-q)/2
multiply both sides by 2 and the 2 on the right hand side cancels out

2Q=p-q
2Q-p=-q

you don't want to have -q so instead you want to end up with something for q. just flip the signs or multiply the whole thing by -.

-(2Q-p=-q)
-2Q+p=q

p-2Q is the same as p+(-2Q) and that's equivalent to -2Q+p in which both cases the the 2Q has a negative sign and the p has a positive.

hope that help! :o
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
594
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K