Solve for X: ln(x) + ln(x+1) = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter r_swayze
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation ln(x) + ln(x+1) = 1, which falls under the subject area of logarithmic equations and algebraic manipulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the logarithmic equation into a quadratic form, leading to the expression x^2 + x - e = 0. Some participants confirm this transformation and discuss the next steps for solving the quadratic equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants confirming the correctness of the transformation and exploring methods to solve the resulting quadratic equation. There is no explicit consensus on the method of solution, but guidance on using the quadratic formula has been suggested.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of factoring the quadratic equation, indicating a reliance on the quadratic formula for finding solutions.

r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Im having trouble finding the solution to this problem, can anyone walk me through this?

So far I have:

ln(x) + ln(x+1) = 1

ln(x)(x+1) = 1

e^1 = x(x+1)

e^1 = x^2 + x

This is where I get stuck.
Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r_swayze said:
e^1 = x^2 + x

Yes this is correct. Write e^1 as just e, which is constant.
If you move it to the other side you'll get:
x2+x-e =0

Now how do you solve the equation ax2+bx+c=0?
 
rock.freak667 said:
Yes this is correct. Write e^1 as just e, which is constant.
If you move it to the other side you'll get:
x2+x-e =0

Now how do you solve the equation ax2+bx+c=0?

I don't think x^2 + x - e = 0 can factor out, at least not without using the quadratic formula
 
r_swayze said:
I don't think x^2 + x - e = 0 can factor out, at least not without using the quadratic formula

Then use the wquadratic equation formula and you'd solve for x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K