Solve HCP Packing C/A Ratio: Geometry & 1.67 Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benndamann33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The ideal c/a ratio for hexagonal close packing (hcp) is established as 1.67, derived from geometric relationships between atomic positions. The side length 'a' of the hexagon is defined as 2R, where R is the sphere radius. The height 'c' is determined by the positioning of atoms in the middle plane, which aligns with the centroids of equilateral triangles formed by nearest neighbor atoms in the basal plane. The relationship is confirmed through Pythagorean theorem calculations, illustrating that 4R² = a² + (c/2)².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hexagonal close packing (hcp) geometry
  • Familiarity with atomic radius and nearest neighbor concepts
  • Basic knowledge of Pythagorean theorem
  • Ability to interpret geometric diagrams related to atomic structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the c/a ratio in different crystal structures
  • Learn about the implications of atomic packing in materials science
  • Explore symmetry arguments in crystallography
  • Investigate the effects of packing efficiency on material properties
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, crystallographers, and students studying solid-state physics or chemistry who seek to understand atomic packing and its implications on material properties.

benndamann33
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve for the ideal c/a ratio of hcp packing. why doesn't c/2 =a/2, looks like they pass through the same amoutn of radius's so I'm not sure the geometry to use. Used this pic http://www.engr.ku.edu/~rhale/ae510/lecture2/sld013.htm but it is more confusing to me how 1.67 comes out. Help please?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the middle picture in the link you provided.

In the c-direction, there is an extra layer of atoms (triangle) between the top and bottom layers (hexagonal). The a-length is the side of the hexagon, but also the distance among adjacent atoms in the 'basal' plane. The dimension 'a' is in the closest-packing direction. The packing is less efficient in the c-direction.
 
I understand what you're saying about the picutre now, but I don't understand what you're using to compare C and A. I know where a is and i know where c is but i don't know the other length of triangle built between them, so i'ts unclear to me as to what the link is between their length
Ben
 
It's not obvious.

The trick is in realizing that the middle plane of atoms occupy positions directly above the centroids of the triangles in the base plane. This follows directly from a symmetry argument.

1. Each basal plane has nearest neighbor atoms making equilateral triangles. So, a=2R (where R is the sphere radius).

2. Each atom at height c/2 above the basal plane is positioned directly above the centroid of the triangles in the base plane. For an equilatreral triangle, the distance from a vertex to the centroid is two-thirds the length of the median, and is hence (2/3)*(a\sqrt{3}/2) = a/\sqrt{3}.

3. Each atom in the base plane has a nearest neighbor in this middle plane. So, the distance from the corner atom in the base plane to the nearby atom in the mid-plane is 2R.

4. This distance can also be calculated from Pythagoras, giving:
4R^2 = a^2 = (a/\sqrt{3})^2 + (c/2)^2

That should get you home.
 
thank you I was feeling like an idiot that I couldn't girue this out, I'm glad it doesn't appear to really be a trivial process. I appreciate the help,
Ben
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
49K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
24K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K