MHB Solve Integer Equation: 3x+5y=2xy-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The integer equation 3x + 5y = 2xy - 1 can be transformed by multiplying by 2 and rearranging to yield 4xy - 6x - 10y = 2. This can be factored into (2x - 5)(2y - 3) = 17. Given that 17 is a prime number, there are four possible integer solutions for (x, y): (11, 2), (3, 10), (-6, 1), and (2, -7). The discussion emphasizes the factorization method to find these integer pairs. The approach confirms that different starting points can lead to the same solutions.
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Solve in integers $3x + 5y = 2xy - 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]
Multiply by $2$ and rearrange: $4xy - 6x - 10y = 2.$

Factorise: $(2x-5)(2y-3) = 17.$

Since $17$ is prime, there are just four possible cases:

1) $\quad 2x-5 = 17$, $2y-3 = 1$, giving $(x,y) = (11,2).$

2) $\quad 2x-5 = 1$, $2y-3 = 17$, giving $(x,y) = (3,10).$

3) $\quad 2x-5 = -17$, $2y-3 = -1$, giving $(x,y) = (-6,1).$

4) $\quad 2x-5 = -1$, $2y-3 = -17$, giving $(x,y) = (2,-7).$
[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]
Multiply by $2$ and rearrange: $4xy - 6x - 10y = 2.$

Factorise: $(2x-5)(2y-3) = 17.$

Since $17$ is prime, there are just four possible cases:

1) $\quad 2x-5 = 17$, $2y-3 = 1$, giving $(x,y) = (11,2).$

2) $\quad 2x-5 = 1$, $2y-3 = 17$, giving $(x,y) = (3,10).$

3) $\quad 2x-5 = -17$, $2y-3 = -1$, giving $(x,y) = (-6,1).$

4) $\quad 2x-5 = -1$, $2y-3 = -17$, giving $(x,y) = (2,-7).$
[/sp]

My starting point is different and it becomes same as above

We have $2xy - 3x - 5y - 1 = 2( x - \frac{5}{2}) ( y - \frac{3}{2}) - 1 - \frac{15}{2} = 0$
or $ 2 ( 2x - 5) (2y - 3) = 2 * 17$
or $( 2x - 5) (2y-3) = 17$
Note that LHS is odd and so is RHS.
giving 4 solutions
$2x- 5 = -1, 2y -3= -17$ or $x = 2, y = - 7$
$2x -5 = -17, 2y -3= -1$ or $x = -6, y = 1$
$2x- 5 = 1, 2y -3= 17$ or $x = 3, y = 10$
$2x -5 = 17, 2y -3= -1$ or $x = 11, y = 2$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top