MHB Solve Integer Equation: 3x+5y=2xy-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary
The integer equation 3x + 5y = 2xy - 1 can be transformed by multiplying by 2 and rearranging to yield 4xy - 6x - 10y = 2. This can be factored into (2x - 5)(2y - 3) = 17. Given that 17 is a prime number, there are four possible integer solutions for (x, y): (11, 2), (3, 10), (-6, 1), and (2, -7). The discussion emphasizes the factorization method to find these integer pairs. The approach confirms that different starting points can lead to the same solutions.
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Solve in integers $3x + 5y = 2xy - 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]
Multiply by $2$ and rearrange: $4xy - 6x - 10y = 2.$

Factorise: $(2x-5)(2y-3) = 17.$

Since $17$ is prime, there are just four possible cases:

1) $\quad 2x-5 = 17$, $2y-3 = 1$, giving $(x,y) = (11,2).$

2) $\quad 2x-5 = 1$, $2y-3 = 17$, giving $(x,y) = (3,10).$

3) $\quad 2x-5 = -17$, $2y-3 = -1$, giving $(x,y) = (-6,1).$

4) $\quad 2x-5 = -1$, $2y-3 = -17$, giving $(x,y) = (2,-7).$
[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]
Multiply by $2$ and rearrange: $4xy - 6x - 10y = 2.$

Factorise: $(2x-5)(2y-3) = 17.$

Since $17$ is prime, there are just four possible cases:

1) $\quad 2x-5 = 17$, $2y-3 = 1$, giving $(x,y) = (11,2).$

2) $\quad 2x-5 = 1$, $2y-3 = 17$, giving $(x,y) = (3,10).$

3) $\quad 2x-5 = -17$, $2y-3 = -1$, giving $(x,y) = (-6,1).$

4) $\quad 2x-5 = -1$, $2y-3 = -17$, giving $(x,y) = (2,-7).$
[/sp]

My starting point is different and it becomes same as above

We have $2xy - 3x - 5y - 1 = 2( x - \frac{5}{2}) ( y - \frac{3}{2}) - 1 - \frac{15}{2} = 0$
or $ 2 ( 2x - 5) (2y - 3) = 2 * 17$
or $( 2x - 5) (2y-3) = 17$
Note that LHS is odd and so is RHS.
giving 4 solutions
$2x- 5 = -1, 2y -3= -17$ or $x = 2, y = - 7$
$2x -5 = -17, 2y -3= -1$ or $x = -6, y = 1$
$2x- 5 = 1, 2y -3= 17$ or $x = 3, y = 10$
$2x -5 = 17, 2y -3= -1$ or $x = 11, y = 2$
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K