Solve Integration Problems: Partial Fractions for 1/(x^2)(x-4)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function 1/(x^2)(x-4) using partial fraction decomposition. Participants are exploring the correct setup and simplification of the expression for integration purposes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different forms of partial fraction decomposition, questioning the necessity of certain terms in the numerator. There are attempts to clarify the notation used in expressing the fractions, as well as the implications of simplification for integration.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the simplification of terms for integration, and there is an exploration of different interpretations of the partial fraction setup.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of discrepancies between participants' results and those obtained from Mathematica, indicating potential confusion or differing interpretations of the decomposition process.

Deathfish
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Someone teach me how to write equations using the editor here...

This is part of an integration question

need partial fractions of 1/(x^2)(x-4)


Homework Equations



-nil-

The Attempt at a Solution



1/(x^2)(x-4)=(Ax+B)/(x^2)+C(x-4)

Put x=0 therefore B=-1/4
put x=4 therefore C= 1/16
Put x=1 therefore A=-1/16

1/(x^2)(x-4)=(-1/16)(x+4)/x^2 +1/16(x-4)

I get a different result on Mathematica, someone help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Deathfish! :smile:

If your result is

[tex]-\frac{x+4}{16x^2}+\frac{1}{16(x+4)}[/tex]

then it is completely correct!
Now, why does mathematica give another result? Well, the above result can be put in a form that is even more convenient. Indeed, the term [itex]\frac{x+4}{16x^2}[/itex] can be "simplified" further as

[tex]\frac{x+4}{16x^2}=\frac{1}{16x}+\frac{1}{4x^2}[/tex]

This is a better form since it's more suitable for integration purposes. But your result isn't wrong!
 
The x2 factor in the denominator is not an irreducible quadratic, so there is no need for a term with Ax + b in the numerator.

I would decompose the expression in this way:
[tex]\frac{1}{x^2(x - 4)} = \frac{A}{x} + \frac{B}{x^2} + \frac{C}{x - 4}[/tex]

How you did it is essentially the same as above, since Ax/x2 is the same as A/x.
 
Could the A/X + B/X^2 also be written as Ax+B/X^2. I think you could because splitting it up into Ax/x^2 + B/x^2 is also seen as A/x + B/x^2. Also sorry about dead post reviving...very curious.
 
Dartx4 said:
Could the A/X + B/X^2 also be written as Ax+B/X^2.
Yes, but you need parentheses. What you wrote would be considered to be Ax + (B/x2), and I'm certain that's not what you meant.

Write it as (Ax + B)/x2.
Dartx4 said:
I think you could because splitting it up into Ax/x^2 + B/x^2 is also seen as A/x + B/x^2. Also sorry about dead post reviving...very curious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K