Solve Linear Equations: 1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation 1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x), which is misinterpreted due to ambiguous notation. The equation is clarified to represent a quadratic equation rather than a linear one, specifically leading to 45x² - 63x + 25 = 0, which has no real roots. The importance of clear mathematical communication is emphasized, suggesting that formulas should be accompanied by explanations of their purpose and context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic notation and operations
  • Familiarity with linear and quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of least common denominators in fraction manipulation
  • Ability to interpret and clarify mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of solving quadratic equations using the quadratic formula
  • Learn about the implications of ambiguous notation in mathematical expressions
  • Explore methods for simplifying complex fractions in algebra
  • Research effective communication strategies for presenting mathematical solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone involved in mathematics who seeks to improve their problem-solving skills and clarity in mathematical communication.

abhishekdas1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming you're trying to solve this equation. What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
 
abhishekdas said:
1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x)
Besides, the notation 1/3x is somewhat ambiguous: it may mean either (1/3)x or 1/(3x). The same pertains to coefficients 1/5 and 1/3: it is recommended to write (1/5) if this number is followed by multiplication. Note that if 1/3x means (1/3)x, then the equation is not linear. So please clarify what you mean by inserting parentheses.
 
abhishekdas said:
1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x)
Since you titled this "linear equations" I would have assumed that your "1/3x" mean "(1/3)x"- that is, "one third times x" rather than 1/(3x), 1 divided by 3x. But then your "1/x" confuses me. From that I have to conclude that this is NOT, as it stands, a "linear equation" and you intend \frac{1}{5}\frac{1}{3x- 5}= \frac{1}{3}\left(3- \frac{1}{x}\right).

The simplest way to handle problems like this is to get rid of all those fractions by multiplying both sides by the "least common denominator". Since there are no "duplicates" here, the "least common denominator" is just the product of all of the denominators (5)(3x- 4)(3)(x). Multiplying on both side by that will cancel the denominators "5" and "3x - 5" on the left and the denominators "3" and "x" on the right leaving 3x= 5(3x- 5)(3x- 1) which still is not linear- it is the quadratic equation 3x= 45x^2- 60x+ 25 or 45x^2- 63x+ 25= 0. But that equation has no real number roots.
 
1/(15x) -1=1- 1/(3x)

- - - Updated - - -

6/15x =2
 
Tennisgoalie said:
1/(15x) -1=1- 1/(3x)

- - - Updated - - -

6/15x =2
If you have no further questions, then it is a good idea to mark the thread as solved. Otherwise, please post your questions. The thing is that contrary to what some people may think, bare formulas almost never constitute a piece of mathematical work. They must be accompanied by plain text explanations saying what we want to do with such formulas (e.g., solve an equation or find a counterexample), whether a given formula is an assumption or something to prove, what the difficulty of the problem is, why should one consider such problem interesting and so on.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Tennisgoalie said:
1/(15x) -1=1- 1/(3x)

- - - Updated - - -

6/15x =2

If you have no further questions, then it is a good idea to mark the thread as solved. Otherwise, please post your questions. The thing is that contrary to what some people may think, bare formulas almost never constitute a piece of mathematical work. They must be accompanied by plain text explanations saying what we want to do with such formulas (e.g., solve an equation or find a counterexample), whether a given formula is an assumption or something to prove, what the difficulty of the problem is, why should one consider such problem interesting and so on.

What happened here is that help was given by Tennisgoalie to the OP. Admittedly, this would perhaps have been more clear had the post looked more like:

Tennisgoalie said:
abhishekdas said:
1/5(1/3x-5)=1/3(3-1/x)

Assuming the equation is to be interpreted as follows:

(1/5)(1/(3x) - 5) = (1/3)(3 - 1/x)

then distribution on both sides yields:

1/(15x) -1 = 1 - 1/(3x)

Multiplying 1/(3x) by 5/5 to get 5/(15x), we may then add 1 + 5/(15x) to both sides to obtain:

6/(15x) = 2

Can you continue?

However, Tennisgoalie just joined MHB within the last 24 hours and may be new to math help sites in general and inexperienced with how to most effectively provide help to others, such as to use plain text to elucidate the steps taken.
 
Ah, sorry, I should have checked the usernames. Thanks to Tennisgoalie for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K