MHB Solve Set Problems on Books (Sweating): Get Ideas Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Set
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving set problems related to book types at a bookstall, specifically concerning translations and scientific categories. It identifies that there are 11 English scientific translation book types and 2 English book types that are not translations. The participants work through the relationships between English and non-English books, as well as translations, using a Venn diagram for clarity. Additionally, they confirm that the number of book types neither in English nor translations constitutes 28% of the total displayed. The conversation emphasizes logical reasoning and mathematical calculations to arrive at these conclusions.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
(Sweating) Any Ideas on how to begin?

An incomplete Venn diagram containing the information about 100 types of books displayed at bookstall is shown in the figure.

View attachment 5975

(i) There were 70 translation book types and also there were 40 scientific translation book types that were not in English. How many English scientific translation book types were there?

(ii) If there were 20 English book types, how many of them were not translations?

(iii) Show that the number of book types which were neither in English nor translations were $\frac{7}{25}$ of the total number of types displayed in the bookstall.

(iv) Taking into account the selling ratios of book types he had experienced during the previous sales the bookstall owner had brought the book types to the stall in the same ratio. Find the probability that a randomly chosen student who visited the bookstall had bought an English translation book type.

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • New Document 43-Page .jpg
    New Document 43-Page .jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 126
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's begin with scientific translations. From the diagram, we see that there are two groups within it, English and non-English (of which there are 40).

We know there are 70 translations types total, so we may state:

70 = #English translations(non-scientific) + #English translations(scientific) + #non-English translations(non-scientific) + #non-English translations(scientific)

Fill in what we know so far:

70 = 7 + #English translations(scientific) + 12 + 40

70 = #English translations(scientific) + 59

11 = #English translations(scientific)

Okay, now look at the English types. There are 3 groups, and you now know two of them...can you get the third, which will answer part ii)?
 
MarkFL said:
Let's begin with scientific translations. From the diagram, we see that there are two groups within it, English and non-English (of which there are 40).

We know there are 70 translations types total, so we may state:

70 = #English translations(non-scientific) + #English translations(scientific) + #non-English translations(non-scientific) + #non-English translations(scientific)

Fill in what we know so far:

70 = 7 + #English translations(scientific) + 12 + 40

70 = #English translations(scientific) + 59

11 = #English translations(scientific)

Okay, now look at the English types. There are 3 groups, and you now know two of them...can you get the third, which will answer part ii)?

Thank you very much (Yes)(Smile)(Happy)

mathlearn said:
(ii) If there were 20 English book types, how many of them were not translations?

Many Thanks :)

20=(#english translations) +(#english scientific translations)+(#english)
20= 7+11+(#english)
20=18+(#english)
2=(#english)

So 2 of the english books were not translations;

Many Thanks MarkFL (Smile)
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • mathlearnvenn.jpg
    mathlearnvenn.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 108
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top