Solve the Elevator Jump Problem: 9.8m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter MARS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Jump
AI Thread Summary
In a falling elevator moving at a constant velocity, jumping will not allow a person to hit the ceiling, as the jump capacity remains unchanged compared to a stationary elevator. The key factor is that the elevator's constant velocity does not affect the jump height; only acceleration influences this. If a person cannot reach the ceiling in a still elevator, they won't be able to do so in a moving one either. Inside the elevator, one cannot distinguish between being at rest or moving at a constant speed without external cues. Thus, the speed of 9.8 m/s is irrelevant to the jump height in this context.
MARS
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I know that if you are in a free falling elevator and you jump up you will hit the ceiling, something you could not do in an elevator that was still. But if the elevator was falling at a constant velocity, say 50 miles per hour, when you jump up will you also hit the ceiling because you are falling faster than 9.8m/s or will you jump the same height you did in a still elevator or an elevator moving at a constant velocity less than 9.8m/s? Keep in mind that the elevator is going 50 miles per hour at a constant velocity not accelerating like in a free fall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean 9.8m/s² ?
The velocity has absolutely no effect on your jump capacity.
It is the acceleration of the elevator that changes you jump capacity.
 
MARS said:
Okay, so I know that if you are in a free falling elevator and you jump up you will hit the ceiling, something you could not do in an elevator that was still. But if the elevator was falling at a constant velocity, say 50 miles per hour, when you jump up will you also hit the ceiling because you are falling faster than 9.8m/s or will you jump the same height you did in a still elevator or an elevator moving at a constant velocity less than 9.8m/s? Keep in mind that the elevator is going 50 miles per hour at a constant velocity not accelerating like in a free fall.

I Agree with maajdl.

You would weigh the same, and if you could not jump high enough to reach the ceiling of the elevator when it was standing still, then you would not be able jump high enough to reach the ceiling when it is moving. The two situations are exactly equivalent. Even the tidal forces would be the same.

In fact, if you did not know whether or not you and the elevator were moving inertially or standing still (i.e. no noise, no rocking, etc.), then from inside the elevator there would be no experiment that you could perform which would allow you to determine that.
 
Last edited:
What makes you think the speed of 9.8 m/s is relevant to that question?
 
It is hard to accept that you would be totally unaware if the lift were traveling downward at uniform velocity - it is not intuitive. This, I think, is because we never (very seldom) actually experience the situation in a form that we recognise. But you can prove it if you take a spring balance and a 1kg mass with you, next time you go in a lift. The mass will register 1kg all the time the lift is moving at steady speed, the 'weight' will change at the start and finish, whilst the lift is accelerating (+ or -). Take a nice long lift journey - like in the Shard or Empire State, where end effects are only a small part of the trip.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top