Solve the given problem involving parametric equations

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving parametric equations and determining the conditions for two chords, PQ and RS, to be perpendicular. The gradients of the chords are calculated, leading to the conclusion that the product of their gradients must equal -1 for perpendicularity. The participants explore various methods to establish this relationship, including vector analysis and gradient calculations. A key point is the need to prove that if PQ is perpendicular to RS, then the product pqrs equals -1. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to reach the conclusion.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
##P,Q,R## and ##S## are four points on the hyperbola ##x=ct, y=\dfrac{c}{t}## with parameters ##p,q,r## and ##s## respectively. Prove that, if the chord ##PQ## is perpendicular to the chord ##RS##, then ##pqrs=-1##.
Relevant Equations
parametric equations
My take;

##y=\dfrac{c^2}{x}##

##y+x\dfrac{dy}{dx}=0##

##\dfrac{dy}{dx}=\dfrac{-y}{x}##

##y-\dfrac{c}{t}=-\dfrac{y}{x}(x-ct)##

##yt-c=-\dfrac{yt}{x}(x-ct)##

##xyt-cx=-yt(x-ct)##

##c^2t-cx=-cx+yct^2##

##c^2t-cx=-cx+ytct##

##c^2t-cx=-cx+c^2t##

##⇒-cx=-cx##

##⇒cx=cx##

Therefore it follows that,

##\dfrac{c}{c}=\dfrac{x}{x}##

##x=c##

##y## will be given by,

##y=\dfrac{c^2}{c}=c##

point P will have co-ordinates ##(x,y)=(c,c)## and point Q will have co-ordinates ##(x,y)=(-c,-c)## where gradient is given by;

##m=\dfrac{c--c}{c--c}=\dfrac{2c}{2c}=1##

It follows that the perpendicular to the chord RS will have gradient =-1.

I do not have the solution to this question...your input is highly appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-calculus solution:

The 4 points are: ##P(cp, \frac cp), Q(cq, \frac cq), R(cr, \frac cr)## and ##S(cs, \frac cs)##.

Start by finding the gradient of ##PQ##: ##m_{PQ} = \frac { \Delta y}{\Delta x}## where, for example, ## \Delta x= cq - cp = c(q-p)##.

Take it from there !
 
Steve4Physics said:
Non-calculus solution:

The 4 points are: ##P(cp, \frac cp), Q(cq, \frac cq), R(cr, \frac cr)## and ##S(cs, \frac cs)##.

Start by finding the gradient of ##PQ##: ##m_{PQ} = \frac { \Delta y}{\Delta x}## where, for example, ## \Delta x= cq - cp = c(q-p)##.

Take it from there !
Ok i am getting the following;

Gradient of chord ##PQ=\left[\dfrac{-1}{qp}\right]## now if ##PQ## is perpendicular to chord ##RS## then the product of their gradients =##-1##, therefore,Gradient of chord ##RS=\left[\dfrac{-1}{sr}\right]=-1, ⇒sr=1##

...therefore ##pqrs=-1##.
 
chwala said:
Gradient of chord ##RS=\left[\dfrac{-1}{sr}\right]=-1, ⇒sr=1##

...therefore ##pqrs=-1##.
Correct final conclusion but the method is wrong.

##RS=\left[\dfrac{-1}{sr}\right]=-1, ⇒sr=1## doesn't work. For example the gradient of SR could be 3 and the gradient of PQ could be ##-\frac 13##.

Remember, you are being asked to prove "that, if the chord PQ is perpendicular to the chord RS, then pqrs= -1".
 
I do not seem to get it...

Ok, let ##m_1## and ##m_2## be the gradients of ##PQ## and ##RS## respectively;

##m_1=\left[\dfrac{-1}{qp}\right]##

##m_2=\left[\dfrac{-1}{sr}\right]##

we know that ##m_1×m_2=-1## therefore,

##\dfrac{-1}{qp}×\dfrac{-1}{sr}=-1##

##\dfrac{1}{qp}×\dfrac{1}{sr}=-1##

##\dfrac{1}{pqsr}=-1##

on cross-multiplying we end up with;

##pqsr=-1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
The vector from P to Q is ##(q-p)c\hat{i}+\left(\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}\right)c\hat{j}##. The vector from R to S is ##(s-r)c\hat{i}+\left(\frac{1}{s}-\frac{1}{r}\right)c\hat{j}##. For these chords to be perpendicular, the dot product of these two vectors must be zero.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...