MHB Solve the Puzzle: 4, 5, 14, 185, .... - Ray Salmon

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
ok somebody sent me this on youtube but I don't think is a workable series

Rimbus Jift
@ray salmon Quick IQ test... Solve: 4, 5, 14, 185, ...

so first the difference between the numbers is 1,9,171so far just some ideas
The factors of 171 are 1, 3, 9, 19, 57, 171
$9^0 =1$ and $4+1=5$
$9^1 =9$ and $5+9=14$

$9+5=14$
$9+14=19$
$9\cdot 19=171 $
anyway ?

i plugged into W|F but didn't return a series
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
ok somebody sent me this on youtube but I don't think is a workable series

Rimbus Jift
@ray salmon Quick IQ test... Solve: 4, 5, 14, 185, ...

so first the difference between the numbers is 1,9,171so far just some ideas
The factors of 171 are 1, 3, 9, 19, 57, 171
$9^0 =1$ and $4+1=5$
$9^1 =9$ and $5+9=14$

$9+5=14$
$9+14=19$
$9\cdot 19=171 $
anyway ?

i plugged into W|F but didn't return a series
You should know by now that you can choose any number to be the next one. For example we can use
[math]f(x) = -28 x^4 + \dfrac{917}{3} x^3 - 1130 x^2 + \dfrac{5014}{3} x - 815[/math]

and get f(1) = 4, f(2) = 5, f(3) = 14, f(4) = 185. and the next number in the series will be f(5) = 0.

-Dan
 
ok actually I haven't seen that,
the few series I worked on just plug and played with values of n till you got an eq to generate the series
the imperative "solve" does not insist that it is series generated by an eq but I assume that was the intention
why woufd f(5)=0 or is that just arbitrary

Anyway it does seem slam dung stuff
 
karush said:
ok actually I haven't seen that,
the few series I worked on just plug and played with values of n till you got an eq to generate the series
the imperative "solve" does not insist that it is series generated by an eq but I assume that was the intention
why woufd f(5)=0 or is that just arbitrary

Anyway it does seem slam dung stuff
f(5) is arbitrary. For example:
[math]f(x) = -\dfrac{671}{24} x^4 + \dfrac{1221}{4} x^3 - \dfrac{27085}{24} x^2 + \dfrac{6677}{4} x -814[/math]

gives f(1) = 4, f(2) = 5, f(3) = 14, f(4) = 185, and f(5) = 1.

etc. And you can do other fits aside from polynomials pretty much so long as you have 5 unknowns and the system can be solved. (Polynomials are easy to fit which I why I prefer to use them for demonstrations.)

A problem like this assumes that you can figure out a pattern but unfortunately any more information that you might get could change that answer. So I feel that problems like this are just silly.

-Dan
 
ok I think so too ,...

but curious
what online series calculators are good if you just give a list of 6 numbers which assumes a generator eq
I guess W|F will but haven't tried
 
Someone just posted this on YT again in a random Covid video (9/10/23). I started down the same line as above, noticing the differences of each number in the series is a multiple of 3, but this didn't lead anywhere. I played with the numbers and realized they are each 11 away from a square.

In fact 4²-11 = 5; 5²-11 = 14; 14²-11=185. So the answer is 185²-11 = 34,214.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and PeroK
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top