Solve Using Method of Node Voltages

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a circuit problem using the Method of Node Voltages, specifically addressing the calculation of voltages V1 and V2, which should be -3.214 V and -12.214 V, respectively. Participants identified that the error arose from incorrectly including the term (V1-V2)/1 in the equations, as the current through the 1-ohm resistor does not affect V1 and V2. The correct approach involves recognizing that the voltage source in parallel with the resistor ensures a constant current of 9 amps, independent of V1 and V2. Additionally, the voltage across the 5-ohm resistor can be interpreted as either -3.214 V or +3.214 V, depending on the reference point used for measurement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Method of Node Voltages
  • Familiarity with circuit components such as voltage sources and resistors
  • Knowledge of supernodes and current paths in electrical circuits
  • Basic principles of voltage measurement and reference points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of supernodes in circuit analysis
  • Learn about source transformation techniques in circuit theory
  • Explore the concept of voltage measurement and reference frames
  • Review the impact of parallel components on circuit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing and solving electrical circuits using the Method of Node Voltages.

mkematt96
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


FullSizeRender.jpg
[/B]

Homework Equations


This problem was from a practice exam. I know what V1 and V2 should be but can't get my answer to match. V1 should be -3.214 V and V2 should be -12.214 V

The Attempt at a Solution



See attached picture for my work. [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
upload_2017-10-13_16-34-31.png

What is this thing?
 
I see your problem. It involves the 1 ohm resistor...
Hint: There is a voltage source in parallel with the resistor.

There are two ways you can look at your error. Either you should not have added the (V1-v2)/1 term, because the current though the 1 ohm resistor in no way effects V1 and V2. The other way you can look at it, is you need to write the equations for every current path in and out of the super node, in which case you missed (v2-v1)/1/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
donpacino said:
I see your problem. It involves the 1 ohm resistor...
Hint: There is a voltage source in parallel with the resistor.

There are two ways you can look at your error. Either you should not have added the (V1-v2)/1 term, because the current though the 1 ohm resistor in no way effects V1 and V2. The other way you can look at it, is you need to write the equations for every current path in and out of the super node, in which case you missed (v2-v1)/1/
So I re did the problem taking the (v2-v1)/1 ohm out of the problem and got the right answer. My question is, why don't we need to account for this?
 
mkematt96 said:
So I re did the problem taking the (v2-v1)/1 ohm out of the problem and got the right answer. My question is, why don't we need to account for this?

There is a voltage source in parallel with the resistor. there will always be 9 amps going through the resistor, regardless of the other circuit conditions. It has no dependence on the value of V1 or V2

There are two current paths going to the resistor from your supernode. one going from V1 through the resistor counterclockwise, and one going from v2 through the resistor counterclockwise. You missed the counterclockwise one. If you were to write both equations, they would cancel each other out. Once you learn this will happen, you can just leave it out from the beginning.
 
donpacino said:
There is a voltage source in parallel with the resistor. there will always be 9 amps going through the resistor, regardless of the other circuit conditions. It has no dependence on the value of V1 or V2

There are two current paths going to the resistor from your supernode. one going from V1 through the resistor counterclockwise, and one going from v2 through the resistor counterclockwise. You missed the counterclockwise one. If you were to write both equations, they would cancel each other out. Once you learn this will happen, you can just leave it out from the beginning.
Okay that makes sense thanks. One more quick question... Is the voltage across that 5 ohm resistor also -3.214 V or would it be positive 3.214 V ?
 
mkematt96 said:
Okay that makes sense thanks. One more quick question... Is the voltage across that 5 ohm resistor also -3.214 V or would it be positive 3.214 V ?

Voltage is a differential measurement, like height. If V1 is -3 V, then common usage says the voltage drop across the resistor is -3V. But one could describe the drop in the other direction (drop from the bottom end to the top) in which case the voltage would be positive.

An analogy to height... You're at the top of a mountain. Someone asks how high, you say 3000 feet down (-3000), because you are measuring from the top to the bottom. But then you ask someone else how big it is. they reply 3000 up. It is all about perspective.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K