Solved Poincaré Conjecture: Find Perelman's Proof Here

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Poincaré Conjecture and the availability of Perelman's proof. Users express frustration over broken links to the proof and request fixes. One participant successfully repairs the links, encouraging others to explore the proof for educational purposes. There is a consensus on the beauty and significance of Perelman's work in mathematics and theoretical physics. Engaging with the proof is recommended for those interested in deepening their understanding of the topic.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not like you'll understand it or anything :>>>
 
tgt said:
It's not like you'll understand it or anything :>>>

I know that. I want to read it to see what classes I should take in order to understand it.
 
tgt said:
It's not like you'll understand it or anything :>>>

that's mighty presumptuous
 
okay I fixed them
 
masnevets said:
okay I fixed them

Yay! I would recommend that everyone interested in math or theoretical physics read them and marvel at how beautiful they are.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top