Solving 3 Pendulums Problem: Find t <> t0

  • Thread starter Thread starter boeledi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of finding a time t, distinct from an initial time t0, where three independent pendulums with different frequencies (w1, w2, w3) and the same amplitude (A) oscillate in unison, meaning y1(t) = y2(t) = y3(t). It is noted that there may not always be such a time t, especially if the frequencies are integral multiples of each other. A method to approach the problem involves equating the sine functions of the pendulums and forming a linear Diophantine equation from the resulting conditions. The solution may or may not exist depending on the specific values of the frequencies. The discussion highlights the complexity of synchronizing oscillations in this scenario.
boeledi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
HELP. I need to find a solution to the following problem.

3 totally independent pendulums oscillate with 3 distinct pulsations. There is no mention of any gravity, ... => the motion is infinite.

The 3 pendulums have the very same amplitude (A).

We then consider the following equation:

y = A sin(w t + phi)

Therefore, we obtain:

y1(t) = A sin(w1 t + phi1)
y2(t) = A sin(w2 t + phi2)
y3(t) = A sin(w3 t + phi3)

Question:

phi1, phi2, phi3 are the initial "positions" of the system at time t0 (it is a snapshot of the running system).

For each w : w1 < > w2 < > w3, at a certain moment of time t, we must have: y1(t) = y2(t) = y3(t)

How is it possible to obtain this time t <> t0 ?

Would there be any equation, statistical method, ... that might solve this problem ?

In advance, many thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's an interesting theory:

Consider:
y_1(t)=sin(\pi t)
y_2(t)=2sin(\frac{\pi t}{2})
y_3(t)=2sin(\frac{\pi t}{5}-\frac{\pi}{4})=2cos(\frac{\pi t}{5})

If you plot these, you will see that y_1 and y_2 only meet when t=2 n for n an integer, and that they are both equal to zero at those points.

Now, let's take a look at 2cos(\frac{\pi 2 n}{5})=0
so \frac{2\pi n}{5} \in \{ \frac{\pi}{2} +2\pi k, \frac{3 \pi}{2}+ 2 \pi k \}
But n is an integer, so there's no way to get the 2 in the denomiator. Therefore the three functions never meet simultaneously.
 
"For each w : w1 < > w2 < > w3, at a certain moment of time t, we must have: y1(t) = y2(t) = y3(t)

How is it possible to obtain this time t <> t0 ?"

There need not always be a t such that y1(t) = y2(t) = y3(t)
This is partcularly easy to see if w's are integral multiples of each other.


"Would there be any equation, statistical method, ... that might solve this problem ?"

The way to solve this is to see that the sine of the 2 angles will be equal if (i) they are separated by 2nPi or (ii) they are supplementary to each other. Using this fact, and pairwise equating y1 to y2 and y2 to y3, you get 2 equations, in the variables t, m, n (where m, n are intergers that you have used for 2*Pi*n and 2*Pi*m ). By eliminating t, you have a single linear Diophantine Eqn. in n and m. This may or may not have solutions.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top