Solving 3D Schrodinger Equation - Explaining 1/X(x) Term

  • Thread starter Thread starter Master J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Schrödinger
Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
The schrodinger equation in 3D (time independent).

Letting Phi = X(x).Y(y).Z(z), and solving as a PDE...

The equation looks pretty much the same except there is a separate Hamiltonian for each of the Cartesian coordinates x y z. However, the 1/X(x) term etc. really confuses me, I don't know where it comes from. Could someone perhaps explain??

ie. H_x = [-(h^2)/2m].[1/X(x)].[(d^2)X(x)/d(X(x))^2] + V(x)
^^^^

where h is representing h-bar, and d the partial derivative.

Cheers guys!:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It occurs because you divide through by 1/XYZ to isolate the equations.

But note that using a separation in Cartesian coordinates is not always a viable solution, and will only work for some potentials.
 
Can you perhaps outline the derivation from the start? It's just clearing it up for me...
 
It goes something like assume the potential is an infinite square potential

V(x,y,z) = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 if x,y,z < a \\ \infty else

We can assume a separable solution \Psi (x,y,z) = X(x)Y(y)Z(z)

\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} [Y(y)Z(z) \frac{d^2 X}{dx^2}+X(x)Z(z) \frac{d^2 Y}{dy^2}+X(x)Y(y) \frac{d^2 Z}{dz^2}] + V(x,y,z)XYZ = E(XYZ)

Then just divide everything by 1/XYZ.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top