Solving 3log(x)=6-2x: A Beginner's Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazylum
  • Start date Start date
crazylum
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Where does one begin to solve the equation 3log(x)=6-2x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The solution to that equation is not expressible in terms of elementary functions.
 
Looks like material for Lambert's W (or Newton's method).
 
you could use a numerical approach like Newton's method to find a solution. if I am not mistaken you can say that x>0 since ln(x) is undefined otherwise and then rewrite your equation as x^{3}e^{2x}-e^{6}=0
 
an approximate solution is possible through pt of intersection of the 2 graphs...but i don't think there's any way to find an exact solution save hit n trial
 
MATLAB's solver gave:

\frac{\mathrm{e}^{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{\omega\!\left(\ln\!\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + 2\right)}}

Where \omega is given by: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Omega_function.

Good call by whoever said it needed the Lambert W-function ^_^

But for practical purposes, just use bisection+Newton.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top