Solving 3rd and 4th level equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gunni
  • Start date Start date
Gunni
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I think one of my books mentioned a way of solving third level equations (ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d) and fourth level equations (Same as before, add nx^4) much the same way as you do with second level equations ((-B +- Sqrt(B^2 - 4AC))/2A). I have two questions, do you guys know the formulas for solving those equations and has it been proven that fifth level equations are unsolvable through a general rule?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The story of the cubic solution is interesting.

In the early years of the 16th century an Italian professor of mathematics named "Big Scipio" - Scipione del Ferro - figured out the general solution of the cubic, a trick that had eluded mathematicians for millenia. At this time, mathematics professorships in Italy were staffed through competition. Candidates gave problems to each other to solves, and the winner of the competition got the job. So Scipione taught some of his students how to solve the cubic, as a secret, so they could beat their opponents with cubic equation problems.

It became obvious that Scipio and his students had the solution, and there was a great effort to find what it might be. A crippled man name Tartaglia figured out the method independently, and had fantasies of leaving his low-class job to become a professor. He made the mistake of boasting that he had the solution, and pretty soon a smooth operator named Girolamo Cardano came nosing around.

Cardano was a creative mathemetician but also a rogue. Almost a Shakespearean character. He weasled the solution of the cubic out of Tartaglia with a promise to keep it secret, and then turned around and published it in his next book. Tartaglia was furious, but what could he do? So the solution of the cubic equation was launched, and led to the reluctant acceptance of complex numbers.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top