Solving 4th Degree Equation: √x+y=7, √y+x=11

  • Thread starter Thread starter obing
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the system of equations √x + y = 7 and √y + x = 11, which leads to a fourth-degree equation. Participants suggest isolating y in one equation and substituting it into the other to simplify the problem. This method results in a quartic equation that can be complex to solve, but one solution identified is x = 9, with y = 4. The conversation also touches on the potential for extraneous solutions and the use of graphing tools to visualize the equations. Ultimately, the main solutions derived from the equations are x = 9 and y = 4.
obing
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
√x+y=7
√y+x=11
solving this equation using x=-b√b2-4ac/2a for finding the root is impossible

the equation turns out to be of 4th degree

or two quadratic eq. can anybody help

this isn't a homework , just wanted to know ...;)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you're trying to solve for x in these equations, isolate y in either the first or second and then substitute it into the other equation.

\sqrt{x}+y=7 (1)

\sqrt{y}+x=11 (2)

Rearranging (2) to make y the subject:

\sqrt{y}=11-x

y=(11-x)^2

Now substitute into (1):

\sqrt{x}+(11-x)^2=7

To simplify this it's important to try get rid of the square root. This would imply squaring, but remember if we just squared both sides as it is, something like (\sqrt{a}+b)^2=a+2b\sqrt{a}+b^2 so we don't really get rid of the root, we just create more problems.

So instead, isolate the \sqrt{x} and then square both sides.

Yes you will get a quartic (4th degree) equation and it is generally very complicated to solve, unless you're in luck and this question was devised to have nice, rational roots in which case you could then use the rational root theorem to find them.
But I doubt this since it sounds like you created the problem yourself.
 
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt%28x%29%3D7-%2811-x%29^2

According to this, one real solution, 9, and one complex solution, which I won't attempt to copy...
 
Certainly, x=9 is a solution.

If you continue to solve and finally end with the quartic and then solve that for x, you're given 4 real solutions. Some of these however could be extraneous solutions.

But look at what wolfram gives as solutions to the original system of equations:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt(x)+y=7,+sqrt(y)+x=11"

Also, graphmatica draws \sqrt{y}+x=11 as the parabola y=(11-x)^2 which is fine except that for x>11 it does not satisfy the first equation. And this really stumped me at first.

Well, I'm stumped. Is the only solution x=9 or are there more complex solutions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks guys :)

ive found a way out


if we take x= l2

and y=n2

then √l2 +y= 7 (√x+y=7)


√n2+x =11 (√y+x=11)

which becomes l2+y-7=0 (getting rid of root)



n2+x-11=0

2 quadratic equn. :)

ans sloving it gives x=9 y=4
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top