Solving a Circuit with a Complex Source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a circuit with a complex source, specifically determining the circuit current, ic(t), and the voltage across the capacitor, vc(t). Participants emphasize the importance of working in the frequency domain using phasors and converting capacitance to its complex impedance. The impedance of the capacitor is identified as -j0.025 Ω, and the voltage is calculated as 4.924 - 0.868j. The final expression for ic(t) is derived as 5sin(20t + 9.707°), confirming the phase difference of 90 degrees between voltage and current through the capacitor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phasors in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of complex impedance and its representation
  • Familiarity with time-domain and frequency-domain analysis
  • Basic concepts of reactive power in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of phasors in AC circuit analysis
  • Learn about complex impedance and its role in circuit behavior
  • Research time-domain to frequency-domain conversion techniques
  • Explore reactive power calculations and their implications in circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in AC circuit analysis and reactive power management will benefit from this discussion.

Schfra
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An image of the problem is attached. I need to solve for ic(t) and vc(t) by adding a complex source.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I don’t know where to start here. I don’t understand the question, and I can’t find the information I need in my notes. Can somebody explain what ic(t) and vc(t) are and what it means to add a complex source?
 

Attachments

  • 85BEF30C-45B9-4212-ADAB-BBB8A54E7E3F.jpeg
    85BEF30C-45B9-4212-ADAB-BBB8A54E7E3F.jpeg
    31.4 KB · Views: 290
Physics news on Phys.org
##i_c(t)## is the circuit current in the time domain. ##v_c(t)## is the potential across the capacitor in the time domain.

To solve the problem in the easiest way you'll want to work in the frequency domain, i.e., with phasors. So you need to examine the expression that defines the voltage source and create a phasor (complex) representation of it. Convert the capacitance to its complex impedance. Analyze the circuit.

Once you have solutions in the frequency domain you can convert them to the time domain to answer parts (a) and (b).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and Schfra
gneill said:
##i_c(t)## is the circuit current in the time domain. ##v_c(t)## is the potential across the capacitor in the time domain.

To solve the problem in the easiest way you'll want to work in the frequency domain, i.e., with phasors. So you need to examine the expression that defines the voltage source and create a phasor (complex) representation of it. Convert the capacitance to its complex impedance. Analyze the circuit.

Once you have solutions in the frequency domain you can convert them to the time domain to answer parts (a) and (b).
I found the impedance of the capacitor to be .025j. I found the voltage to be 4.924-.868j. I then divided voltage by total resistance, and converted back to the time domain to get 5sin(20t+9.707deg) for ic(t).

Does this look correct so far?
 
Capacitors always have a negative impedance. Try again with ##Z_C = -j0.025\; \Omega##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
gneill said:
Capacitors always have a negative impedance. Try again with ##Z_C = -j0.025\; \Omega##.

Negative? Between voltage across and current through the capacitor there will be a phase difference of 90 deg.
Of course, we have 1/(jwC)=-jwC.
But are we allowed to say that the impedance is negative?
To me, this is not an academic discussion because in electronics we have "negative impedances" (negative and real)
 
LvW said:
Negative? Between voltage across and current through the capacitor there will be a phase difference of 90 deg.
Of course, we have 1/(jwC)=-jwC.
But are we allowed to say that the impedance is negative?
To me, this is not an academic discussion because in electronics we have "negative impedances" (negative and real)
Well, I was referring to the sign attributed to the quantity. Perhaps I was being a bit sloppy in my terminology when talking about an imaginary quantity.
 
LvW said:
But are we allowed to say that the impedance is negative?
To me, this is not an academic discussion because in electronics we have "negative impedances" (negative and real)

I was taught when starting out with complex arithmetic to always make a sketch
actually two or three sketches
one for the voltages, one for the impedances, and one for the currents.

e.g.
upload_2018-12-7_10-18-36.png


helps keep one's thinking straight
of course that was in the days of slide rules when it was vital to think one step at a time...

old jim
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-7_10-18-36.png
    upload_2018-12-7_10-18-36.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 433
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
As usually, I am late [very late it is now!].
I think it will be easier taken U as reference U[complex]=U+0i and Z=R-0.025i then I=U/Z.
For energy [reactive energy?]
En=∫(U/Z)^2*Xcdt and knowing that theoretically ∫f(t)^2*Xcdt|t=0 t=0.01|=f(t)^3/3/(df(x)/dt)|t=0 t=0.01 sec| you will find
En=2.22209E-06 VARsec?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K