Solving a DC Circuit with OpAmp

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a DC circuit involving operational amplifiers (op-amps) and resistors. The user initially struggles with calculating the currents and voltages at various nodes, particularly with the 6kΩ resistors affecting the results. Through iterative calculations and adjustments, the user concludes that the current I is 0.75 mA, which allows for the determination of other currents and voltages in the circuit. The final equations derived include I_12 = 0.5I - 0.25 and I_2 = V_d/2k, leading to a comprehensive understanding of the circuit behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operational amplifier behavior and ideal op-amp assumptions
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and Kirchhoff's laws
  • Familiarity with potential dividers and series/parallel resistor configurations
  • Basic circuit analysis skills, including solving for currents and voltages
NEXT STEPS
  • Study operational amplifier circuit configurations and their applications
  • Learn about advanced circuit analysis techniques, such as nodal and mesh analysis
  • Explore the impact of feedback in op-amp circuits and stability considerations
  • Investigate the use of simulation tools like LTspice for circuit verification
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and hobbyists looking to deepen their understanding of op-amp circuits and DC analysis techniques.

doublemint
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I am trying to solve for the circuit that I have attached.

So I know that for a opamp, it does not draw any currents into its input side and the nodes b and c are the same potential. To figure out the potential at node b, i need to know I_6, but that 6k resistor is messing everything up.

If I assume that the 6k resistor is parallel to other 6k resistors then I can solve for I_6=1 mA
However, if that is the case then I_12=1 mA as well. But that means that the resulting voltage at node d is 0...which does not make sense..
Furthermore, from node c, I can use that to solve for the potential at node d.

I cannot say all three 6k resistors are in series since from that diagram it does not seem to be unless the ground has to do something with it.

Am I missing something here?

Here is my math:

V_a=12V
I_6=12V/12k = 1mA
therefore: V_b=V_c=6V
I_3=(V_c-3V)/3k = 1mA
V_d=V_c+9I_3=6+9=15V

this does not make sense since from V_a, I_12=1mA and that would result in V_d=0V...

DM
P.S sorry the diagram is so small!
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 517
Physics news on Phys.org
V_a=12V
This can't be right. Why ignore the current I to ground through the 6kΩ?
V_a=12 – I*6k

The potential divider with a pair of 6kΩ resistors gives
V_b=V_a / 2
This potential divider is unloaded because the current into the op-amp + input is so tiny.
 
Ok, that kinda makes sense to me.

So if I care my calculations with V_a=12 – I*6k,
V_c = V_b = 6-I*3k
V_d = V_c -3 +I_3*9k = 12-12I
V_a-I_12 = V_d --> I_12=0.5I
V_b = V_a -I_6*6k --> I_6 = 1-0.5I
Therefore I = I_12 + I_6 = 1 mA

This would mean that the potential at node d is zero. Can opamps do that?
 
V_d = V_c -3 +I_3*9k = 12-12I
12-12I https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon5.gif

I can't see it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well i calculated I_3 as (V_c-3V)/3k = (6-3I-3)/3 = 1-I

so subbing that into V_d = V_c -3 +I_3*9k = 6-3I-3+9(1-I) = 12-12I

unless i calculated I_3 wrong?
 
doublemint said:
well i calculated I_3 as (V_c-3V)/3k = (6-3I-3)/3 = 1-I

so subbing that into V_d = V_c -3[/color] +I_3*9k = 6-3I-3+9(1-I) = 12-12I
Check this.
 
I see, I could exclude the 3V source from the calculation of V_d which would make it 15-12I
So now,
V_a-I_12*12k = V_d = 15-12I
12-6I - I_12*12k = 15-12I
I_12 = 0.5I-0.25

Since V_b = V_a -I_6*6k --> I_6 = 1-0.5I
then I= I_12 +I_6 = 0.75

As for I_2,
It should simply just be I_2 = V_d/2k
and I could just find the value of every other current and voltage by subbing in I.
 
doublemint said:
then I= I_12 +I_6 = 0.75
correct
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K