Solving a F of g of x Chart Placement Exam Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter A.J.710
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a placement exam question involving the composition of functions represented in a chart. The main focus is on finding f(g(5)) by first determining g(5) from the chart, which is 3, and then using that value to find f(3). Participants clarify the process of navigating the chart, emphasizing the distinction between rows and columns. After some confusion, it is established that f(5) is -3 and g(5) is 3, leading to the final answer of f(g(5)) being 2. The collaborative effort helps the original poster understand the correct approach to the problem.
A.J.710
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
Hi, I just took a placement exam for college and I would like to go over some of the questions that I got wrong. There are quite a few but this one in particular keeps me wondering. I know how to do the regular f of g of x when functions are given but in this problem it is just a chart full of numbers. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-06-11 at 3.01.30 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-06-11 at 3.01.30 PM.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 692
Physics news on Phys.org
Check in which column x=5 and see what f(x) is in that column, you then know what f of 5 is, now find out what the g of f of 5 is by following the same procedure as you did for finding the f of x.
 
gerben said:
Check in which column x=5 and see what f(x) is in that column, you then know what f of 5 is, now find out what the g of f of 5 is by following the same procedure as you did for finding the f of x.

So the answer would be 3?
 
Oh sorry, you need to find the f of g of 5 (not the g of f of 5), my original post should have been:

Check in which column x=5 and see what g(x) is in that column, you then know what g of 5 is, now find out what the f of g of 5 is by following the same procedure as you did for finding the g of x.
 
gerben said:
Oh sorry, you need to find the f of g of 5 (not the g of f of 5), my original post should have been:

Check in which column x=5 and see what g(x) is in that column, you then know what g of 5 is, now find out what the f of g of 5 is by following the same procedure as you did for finding the g of x.

So then -3?
 
No, what is g(5)?
 
gerben said:
No, what is g(5)?

Oh, -1? Sorry if it's wrong again I'm still a little confused on which rows to go to.
 
No, to see what g(5) is, you should just check in which column x equals 5 and see what g(x) is in that column.
 
Don't get ahead of yourself. What is g(5) based on that chart? Whatever number that is becomes your new 'x' and then find that number for f(x).
 
  • #10
So in the g column, where the 5 is, x=4. Is this the g(x) or am I still mixing it up?
 
  • #11
No, rows are horizontal, columns are vertical. The x row is the top row, move horizontally to where x=5, below that you see what f(x) is when x=5 and again one below you see what g(x) is when x=5
 
  • #12
Looking at the x row at the top I go to where x=5 then the f row shows -3 and the g row shows 3.

gerben said:
No, rows are horizontal, columns are vertical. The x row is the top row, move horizontally to where x=5, below that you see what f(x) is when x=5 and again one below you see what g(x) is when x=5
 
  • #13
Indeed, so f(5)=-3 and g(5)=3.

You were asked "what is f(g(5))". Now that you know what g(5) is, call it b, you can find out what f(g(5)) is. It is equal to f(b).
 
  • #14
gerben said:
Indeed, so f(5)=-3 and g(5)=3.

You were asked "what is f(g(5))". Now that you know what g(5) is, call it b, you can find out what f(g(5)) is. It is equal to f(b).

So where the g row states 5 right above it in the f row,which is -1.
 
  • #15
Ok so can we agree that g(5) = 3, right? So now you have f(g(5)) = f(3), makes sense?
 
  • #16
No, when solving f(g(5)), meaning f of g of 5, you go like this:
First: What is g(5)? You saw g of 5 is 3, because when x=5 then g(x)=3.
Next: what is f(g(5))... hmm, I know g(5)=3, so the question is: "what is f(3)?"
 
  • #17
Ohhh I think I get it now! So you go back to the top afterwards so it would be 2.
 
  • #18
Correct!
 
  • #19
Great! Thanks guys so much for all of the help.
 
Back
Top