Solving a Lever Problem: Need Help from Experts | Join Our Forum!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Girn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lever
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a lever problem involving a 33m beam with two supports and specific loads applied at different points. The user is struggling to calculate the support reactions due to confusion over the placement of forces and torques. Key points include the need for clarity in presenting the problem, as misinterpretations can lead to errors in calculations. Participants suggest verifying calculations by ensuring total downward forces equal total upward forces and highlight a potential rounding issue with the distributed load. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise problem representation and careful mathematical reasoning in physics problems.
Physics news on Phys.org
Summarizing the problem in text avoids making people squint at photographs.

33m beam has two supports
overhangs both by 5m
600kN at extreme right end
900kN at extreme left end
159kN/m over entire length
Calculate support reactions.
...

You seem to have worked the torques...
Where did you get stuck? Work slowly through the math - showing your reasoning.
 
I don't know where I am getting stuck, but I aint getting the answer. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.. I've tried so many different combinations.. obviously the basis for the formula is clockwise movements=counterclockwise movements, but I aint getting the answer.. and 900kN is not at the extreme left end, its 8m from the left end.
 
Oh I misread that - see the problem with presenting the problem in a photograph?

I'm having trouble treading your working in the photo - I see a 900x8 in there ... that would be the torque about the extreme left end from the 900kN point force. But there is no pivot there: the pivot is 5m, in from that end.

You can reality check your answer by noticing that the total downward force has to equal the total upward force (the beam ain't going anywhere.)

Mind you - taking a look at the answers they give (3297kN and 3453kN) I see they add up to 6750kN upwards... the total downwards force is 6747kN, suggesting that the beam will lift off under a net unbalance 3kN.

I think the distributed force was supposed to be 159.09kN/m ... and somebody rounded off when they shouldn't have.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top