Solving a Long Titration Problem: Net Ionic Equations & Mole Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a complex double titration problem involving HCl and HBr, where the participant successfully completed most of the calculations but struggled with determining the mass of each acid in the original solution. The net ionic equations for the reactions during the titration and subsequent addition of AgNO3 were provided, leading to a total mass of precipitate produced. The key challenge lies in setting up two equations with two unknowns to find the moles of HCl and HBr, as the initial assumption of equal moles was incorrect. The conversation emphasizes the importance of converting grams to moles correctly and maintaining consistent units throughout the calculations. Ultimately, the participant is guided to correctly formulate the equations needed to solve for the unknowns.
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
This was a pretty long double titration problem, I solved it all except for the last part & could use a bit of help because I'm stuck.

Part 1 A 100.00 ml solution containing aqueous HCl & HBr was titrated with .1200 M NaOH. The volume of base required to neutralize the acid was 47.14 mL. a) Write the net ionic equation for both reactions that occur during the titration.
Answer: 2H+ (aq) + 2(OH)- (aq) -> 2H2O (l)

Part 2 Determine the total number of moles of acid (HBr + HCl) in the original solution.
Answer: .002828 mol HBr & .002828 mol HCl

Part 3 Aqueous AgNO3 was then added to the solution (after the titration). Write the net ionic equation for both reactions that occur.
Answer: Br- (aq) + Cl- (aq) + 2Ag+ (aq) -> AgBr (s) + AgCl (s)

Part 4 The total mass of solid produced from the above reactions was .9975 g. Did the original solution contain more HCl or more HBr (in grams)?
This is the part I'm stuck on. At first I tried to take the mass percents of both of the solid products, into the total mass of the solid produced. But when I talked to my professor, she stated there wasn't necessarily equal moles of HCl & HBr in the beginning. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
algebra, 2 equations, 2 unknowns

your professor is right that there is nothing in the problem that says there are equal numbers of moles of HCl and HBr

so the most you can do is say x mol HCl + y mol HBr = .0056568 moles

1. x mol Cl- + y mol Br- = .0056568 mol


that is your first equation with 2 unknowns

the second comes from the ppt with AgNO3

the two products AgBr and AgCl TOGETHER give a combined mass of .9975g

so g AgBr + g AgCl = .9975 g

but this doesn't have the same x and y as the first equation, so change g into something that has mol

MM = g/mol so instead of g make it

MM AgBr * y mol AgBr (write out the net ionic equation for AgBr)

or this is the same as g AgBr = MM AgBR * y mol Br-

(write out the net ionic equation for AgBr)

do the same for AgCl, you get g AgCl = MM AgCl * x mol Cl-


put this back into the grams equation in green and this becomes equation #2

then its an algebra problem... good luck


I probably did too much for you...
 
Last edited:
Ok, so this makes sense, regarding setting up two equations with two unknowns. But if I convert the left side of equation 2 into moles, I still have it equal to grams. I thought about converting the right side into moles, but it doesn't seem like that can actually be done (for example, canceling out the grams with the molecular weight of AgBr + AgCl), & when I tried it, I came up with negative numbers for x & y. Thanks for getting me this far at least.
 
you can't cancel out grams and MM of AgCl, AgBr, they don't have the same units

MM = g/mol

both sides of equation 2 are in grams

MM AgCl =
mol Cl-

= g/mol
mol

gives grams on both sides.

put the numbers in for MM AgCl and AgBr, to make it look better

it is not a nice problem because you have your unknowns in the denominator.hope you're good at algebra
 
I broke the second equation down like this

g AgCl + g AgBr = .9975g

1 g AgCl x (1 mol AgCl/143.25g AgCl) x (1 mol Cl-/1 mol Ag Cl) = .0069759 mol Cl-

doing the same for AgBr I got .0053248 mol Br-

Of course doing this, would leave the other side of the equation in grams.

Ok, so that doesn't work so well. From what I'm gathering your saying
187.7 g AgBR/1 mol x 1 mol Br- = g AgBr which I guess would give me 187.7 MM AgBr/1 mol Br-

For AgCl its 143.15 MM AgCL/1 mol Cl-

So if I plug those numbers into the equation its 187.7 MM AgBr/1 mol Br- + 143.15 MM AgCl/1 mol Cl- = .9975

This is where I'm a bit confused. Having the unknown in the denominator wouldn't be a problem, because you could just invert the whole equation, then use whatever method you like to solve the variables in the two equations (Crammer's Rule is what I usually use for small systems like this one). But does the MM AgBr & MM AgCl every cancel out, or is it just not needed?
 
eli64 said:
you can't cancel out grams and MM of AgCl, AgBr, they don't have the same units

MM = g/mol

both sides of equation 2 are in grams

MM AgCl =
mol Cl-

= g/mol
mol

gives grams on both sides.

put the numbers in for MM AgCl and AgBr, to make it look better

it is not a nice problem because you have your unknowns in the denominator.hope you're good at algebra

SORRY! you're right its not in the denominator

I was muddling my MM = g/mol equn

this should be right

equn 2 is 187.77 * y mol Br- + 143.33 * x mol Cl- = .9975 grams

equn 1 is x + y = .0056568

let y = .0056568 -x

then 187.77 (.0056568 - x) + 143.3 * x = .9975 g

DO be careful with your signs, it looks like x might be neg but you need to bring numbers to the right hand side and keep x on the left (you get neg on both sides which cancel out to give a pos value for x)

SORRY again about my last post , this one does works out
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top