Solving a Problem Using Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving an object moving up a board inclined at 30° while considering forces like gravity and friction. The poster initially attempted to apply Newton's second law and later explored using conservation of mechanical energy to find the friction coefficient (μ). They expressed confusion about their calculations and the lack of clarity in the problem statement regarding what needs to be calculated. The poster ultimately realized they were seeking μ, the friction constant, and outlined their approach to solving the problem. The thread highlights the challenges of understanding physics terminology and concepts while seeking assistance.
Nivoh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance for my lack of knowledge of "physics english".

First off, this is high school level. :)

I'm terribly sorry if this is confusing due to my lack of understand of the subject, the metric system, and my lack of grasp for the English language as well as terminology. What is μ?

Homework Statement




An object is moves up a flat board, the board forms an angle of 30° with the x-axis. During 0.76s, the object accelerates from 5m/s to 0. The only forces affecting the board is gravity and friction.

Homework Equations



ƩF=ma, R=μ*N, E=0.5mv^2+mgh, W=F*s.

The Attempt at a Solution




I initially solved this quite easily using ƩF=ma=mg*sin30°+μ*cos30°, where a=Δt/Δv.

Out of curiousity, I figured I could solve this using conservation of mechanical energy, as R is a constant force.

So I went ahead and used R=μ*N, R=E/s, where E is the mechanical energy lost due to friction. N=mg/cos30°, E=0.5mv^2-mgh, therefore μ=R/N=(0.5mv^2-mgh)*cos30°/mgs. s=1.9m, h=0.95m, g=9.81m/s^2, v=5m/s.

I seem however, to have failed, I wonder why? :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry for being scum of the Earth and bumping my own post, but I really cannot rest without knowing what I've done wrong. Please let me know if my question is unclear, my English not sufficient to describe the problem, or if I'm not following guidelines.
 
Is it only me or is there no actual mention of what we have to calculate in this problem?
 
Rokas_P said:
Is it only me or is there no actual mention of what we have to calculate in this problem?

Duh, how silly of me, my apologies. Thank you for making me aware, was looking for μ, the friction constant.
 
The general outline of how I would approach this problem is this:

1. calculate acceleration
2. write down Newton's Second Law for this problem (here all the sines and cosines come in)
3. calculate μ (since μ is in R=μN)

Edit: I see that you're asking not about how to solve it but why you can't get the right answer when you try to solve it using another method. Hopefully someone can help you out with that :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top